Search
In-Person Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Category
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Affiliate Organization
Browse by Featured Sessions
Browse Spotlight on Central Asian Studies
Drop-in Help Desk
Search Tips
Sponsors
About ASEEES
Code of Conduct Policy
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Session Submission Type: Panel
One of the most frequent impressions foreign visitors to the USSR articulated upon their return was of the prominence of visual propaganda in the Soviet Union. But while the political push for a consistent and prominent visual messaging may have originated from Moscow, this call was implemented differently in different locations across the USSR. This panel explores the aesthetics and pragmatics of Soviet-style instructional visuality (nagliadnaia agitatsia), as it was negotiated and deployed across Soviet space in the second half of the 20th century. Who were the actors that determined the criteria for proper visual pedagogy, and what did nagliadnost’ mean to these different actors? What were the criteria and guiding principles of instructional visuality, and how were they interpreted and implemented in different national and regional contexts, and across a range of domaines, from monumental propaganda to graphic art?
Communism as Reality: The Soviet Union's Agitation Propaganda Reforms - Tatiana Voronina, Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research
A Monumental Task: Inscribing Nizami into the Built Landscape of Azerbaijan’s Capital City - Isabelle Kaplan, Howard U
Imagined Community of Blood: Images of Blood Donation Campaigns in Soviet Lithuania - Natalija Arlauskaite, Vilnius U (Lithuania)