Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Browse By Geographical Focus
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
In 1921, on the heels of three consecutive parched Prairie summers, the United Agricultural Association of Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada hired Charles M. Hatfield to make it rain. Hatfield was a professional rainmaker from California who had plied his trade from Texas to the Klondike, always on the terms “no rain, no pay.” When Hatfield arrived in Medicine in May 1921, it was with an agreement that if he produced 4 inches of rain over the next 3 months, he would earn $8000. Media from across Canada, the US, and Europe joined Prairie farmers in watching to see whether he would succeed.
This is a story with a number of surprising resonances to today: it is a story of a populist conman, an exploitable media, a culture dubious of modern meteorological science, and that science fighting desperately to establish its authority. Even more than a battle between science and folk wisdom, I see it as a battle between facts and opinions. My paper will focus on the debate between newspapers -- even within newspapers -- that summer as to how much -- even whether -- it rained in Southern Alberta, whether this was normal rain, and the degree to which it was all thanks to the rainmaker.