BackHome
Refresh: OffView Personal Schedule
Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Enhancing Doctoral Education in Kazakhstan: Evaluating the Publication Requirement Reform

Tue, March 25, 4:30 to 5:45pm, Palmer House, Floor: 3rd Floor, Crystal Room

Group Submission Type: Refereed Roundtable Session

Proposal

Introduction
Doctoral education is increasingly recognized as a crucial driver of research and innovation, which are vital for social development and economic growth (McAlpine, 2017; Yudkevich et al., 2020). Globally, higher education institutions (HEIs) are modernizing their doctoral programs to better prepare future researchers. Innovations include international mobility, hybrid formats, and the inclusion of external committee members (Shin et al., 2018; Kehm, 2007). Despite these advancements, there is a notable gap in understanding the effectiveness of doctoral programs, especially in non-Western contexts (Lee & Boud, 2009; Maloshonok & Terentev, 2018). This proposal addresses this gap by examining Kazakhstan’s recent reforms in doctoral education, particularly the introduction of a publication requirement.

Project Background
Kazakhstan’s doctoral education reforms, driven by its entry into the Bologna process in 2010, aimed to align with European standards and enhance research capacity (Tomusk, 2011). These reforms include the implementation of PhD programs and stringent publication requirements for degree completion (Kuchumova, 2021). The government’s Strategy for Industrial-Innovative Development 2003-2015 and subsequent State Programs for the Development of Education and Science (IQAA, 2023) emphasize improving research quality and international competitiveness.
The publication requirement mandates that doctoral candidates publish 2-3 articles in international peer-reviewed journals before completing their degrees. While this aims to boost research quality, it has led to debates and challenges within the academic community (Matrica, 2021). Issues include limited research capacity among supervisees, reliance on external advisors, and unethical practices such as predatory publishing. This study seeks to investigate the implementation and impact of this requirement in Kazakhstan.

State of Current Research
Research on doctoral publication requirements is limited, especially in non-Western contexts. In Western countries, publication is often encouraged but not mandatory, except in specialized cases (Kehm, 2020). However, there is growing interest in the Chinese experience with publication requirements (Cargill et al., 2018; Horta & Li, 2023). This proposal aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge by focusing on Kazakhstan’s approach and its implications for doctoral education globally.

Theoretical Framework
This study employs the Process Model of Policy Implementation (Bullock et al., 2021), which provides a comprehensive framework for understanding policy implementation. This model explores how policies evolve from initial ideas to final outcomes, considering the roles of context, interests, institutions, and external factors. By applying this framework, we aim to understand the publication requirement’s policy rationale, implementation processes, and outcomes at various levels.

Project Purpose
The primary objectives of this study are:
1. To Understand the Policy Rationale: Examine the reasons behind the introduction of the publication requirement and how it is interpreted by stakeholders.
2. To Analyze Implementation Mechanisms: Investigate how the requirement is implemented across different universities and the challenges encountered.
3. To Explore Student Experiences: Assess the impact of the requirement on doctoral students, including their experiences and challenges.
4. To Evaluate Impacts on Doctoral Education Quality: Determine the objective and perceived effects of the publication requirement on doctoral education quality and research capacity.
5. To Assess Interaction with Other Reforms: Explore how the publication requirement interacts with other publication-related reforms in research funding and faculty evaluation.

Methodology
The main methods of data collection in the study included document analysis, semi-structured face-to-face and Zoom interviews. Document sample included national policy documents describing the policy, statistics of the Ministry of Education and Science on doctoral degree participation, graduation and outcomes. Interviews entailed 3 samples of participants: (1) Doctoral students (30); (2) Doctoral supervisors (30); (3) Policy makers on doctoral education at the national (10-15) and university levels (10-15).

Preliminary Findings
Rationale for the Publication Requirement. The gathered data indicate that the publication requirement for obtaining a doctoral degree in Kazakhstan serves several objectives, addressing both the challenges of global integration and the goals of internal quality control.
Primarily, the requirement aims to align Kazakhstani research with international standards and promote global academic integration. This is in line with Kazakhstan's adoption of the Bologna system in 2010, which was intended to ensure compliance with European educational standards.
A key rationale identified is the improvement of research quality. As one interviewed supervisor observed, "At that time, there were a lot of varied articles, and many people defended their dissertations and earned titles, but not all of those articles were of particularly high quality." This concern, rooted in the earlier Soviet era, highlights the variability in article quality and underscores the need for stricter selection criteria to ensure high-quality research outputs.
In addition to the direct benefits for Kazakhstan's research sector, the publication requirement also serves political and administrative functions. According to one respondent, it demonstrates the return on investment of governmental funds allocated to doctoral education by increasing research output: "The goal is to increase the number of publications in international databases, in order to report that the allocated funds have contributed to the growth in publications." This aligns with a broader objective to showcase the effectiveness of public investment in higher education.

Sub Unit

Organizer

Chair

Individual Presentations