Action-Oriented Pedagogies for Education for Sustainable Development: A Framework from Global RCE Practices

• In Event: Transformative and Action-Oriented Climate Pedagogies

Proposal

Introduction
Although the Paris Agreement emphasizes education, UNESCO (2021) found that nearly half of national curricula omit climate change. Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) provides a foundation for climate literacy but requires more action-oriented pedagogies (AOPs) to move beyond awareness into practice. This study leverages the global RCE network (190 centres worldwide, with 28 sampled here) to investigate how ESD can empower communities to act on climate change. We ask:
1. What AOPs are implemented in RCEs, and how do they inform a framework for AOP in ESD?
2. How do RCEs integrate multiple AOP components in climate education?
Our findings emphasize the interplay of problem-solving, community engagement, and empathy in localizing global sustainability agendas.

Literature Review
AOPs align with long-standing traditions that position learners as agents who decide and do. The action-competence tradition argues that education should cultivate students’ willingness and ability to take informed action on real issues, not merely acquire knowledge (Jensen & Schnack, 1997). In parallel, transformative learning emphasizes critical reflection that can shift frames of reference and enable new, value-driven actions (Mezirow, 1997). Together, these streams ground AOPs’ emphasis on agency, problem-solving, and reflexivity.
Within sustainability education, social learning and community partnership approaches show how collective inquiry with stakeholders builds shared problem definitions and solutions (Wals, 2007). AOPs also resonate with project-/problem-based learning for sustainability, where authentic, open-ended challenges scaffold collaboration, communication, and decision-making. To support such learning, students need key sustainability competencies—systems, futures, values, strategic, collaboration, and integrated problem-solving (Wiek, Withycombe, & Redman, 2011)—which map closely onto the seven components of our AOP for ESD framework.
Methodology
Researchers conducted eight focus groups and five interviews with representatives from 28 RCEs across Africa, the Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe (September–November 2023). Sessions were held online and during RCE regional and global meetings (e.g., Tongyeong, Korea; Gombak, Malaysia). Data were transcribed and coded inductively using grounded theory (Creswell, 2007). Codes were informed by Varela-Losada et al. (2016) on action competence. Three levels of coding (in vivo, structural, conceptual) ensured reliability, with disagreements resolved by consensus. Analysis highlighted seven overlapping components of AOPs for ESD, revealing both strengths and gaps in implementation across regions.
Findings
The seven AOP components identified are:
1. Problem-based and Real-world Issues – Learners analyze authentic local challenges. At RCE Makana (South Africa), students contextualize climate vulnerabilities in their communities; in RCE Greater Atlanta (USA), field trips to hurricane-damaged coastal areas deepen awareness of equity issues.
2. Learner Participation – Students co-design and lead learning. RCE Scotland frames all learners (youth, parents, teachers) as “leaders of learning.”
3. Community Engagement – Projects mobilize local actors. RCE Okayama (Japan) organizes marine litter cleanups linking citizens, schools, and government.
4. Empathy – Direct engagement fosters perspective-taking. At RCE Greater Gombak (Malaysia), students build projects after immersion in neighboring low-income communities.
5. Regional and Cultural Relevance – African RCEs integrate indigenous values like Ubuntu and use local languages to strengthen ecological awareness.
6. Interdisciplinarity – Teams combine knowledge across fields. At Gombak, students from engineering, health, and social sciences co-develop sustainability projects.
7. Collaboration – Peer and institutional networks expand reach. RCE Southern Vietnam’s “Innovation Camp” fosters teamwork on climate-linked entrepreneurship.

Distribution analysis showed Problem-based Issues, Learner Participation, and Community Engagement dominate (70%), while empathy, cultural relevance, and interdisciplinarity appear less consistently, signaling areas for growth.
Discussion & Conclusion
The AOP for ESD framework demonstrates how education can serve as a bridge between global sustainability goals and local climate action. By positioning learners at the center, supported by educators as facilitators and enriched by the perspectives of community members, AOPs foster participatory environments where sustainability learning is both contextual and transformative. Findings from the RCE network suggest three key insights. First, integration matters: while many RCEs apply individual elements such as problem-based learning or community projects, the impact is amplified when these components are combined with empathy and interdisciplinarity, creating richer opportunities for reflection and action. Second, cultural grounding is essential: initiatives that draw on local values and indigenous knowledge, such as Ubuntu in Africa, resonate more deeply with learners and strengthen long-term community engagement. Third, there are important policy implications: embedding AOP principles into curricula can ensure that climate education becomes participatory, locally relevant, and action-driven, rather than confined to abstract knowledge. Taken together, these insights highlight the unique contribution of RCEs in advancing climate education. By scaling and adapting these pedagogies, schools and communities can cultivate empowered learners who not only understand the complexities of climate change but are also prepared to take meaningful action in response.

References
Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Plano Clark, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032004003
Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462970030205
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., ... & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(S1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401
Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2019). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842
UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802
Varela-Losada, M., Arias-Correa, A., Pérez-Rodríguez, U., & Vega-Marcote, P. (2016). How can teachers motivate students to commit to sustainability? Evaluation of a didactic model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3468–3477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.189
Wals, A. E. J. (Ed.). (2007). Social learning towards a sustainable world: Principles, perspectives, and praxis. Wageningen Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-594-9
Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6

Authors

• Sawaros Thanapornsangsuth, Chulaongkorn School of Integrated Innovation

• Jonghwi PARK, United Nations University - Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability