On bad intentions and harmful consequences: Understanding public perceptions of environmental crime seriousness

• In Event: EUROC 11 Green Criminology: Public and perpetrator perceptions and rationalisations of environmental crime

Abstract

The public has grown increasingly concerned about environmental issues. However, very few studies examine the perceived seriousness of environmental crimes. Those that do tend to focus on US citizens and compare crime seriousness ratings among different types of crimes, rather than examining which factors contribute to perceived crime seriousness. By employing vignette surveys (N=262) among Dutch citizens, the current paper seeks to address this knowledge gap, focusing on two such factors: (1) whether or not the environmental crime is committed intentionally, and (2) whether or not the environmental crime causes significant harm. The results show that environmental crimes were perceived as more serious when committed intentionally and when they had harmful consequences. Furthermore, intentions affected perceived seriousness less in case of harm, and harm affected perceived seriousness less in case the crime was committed intentionally. Together, these findings enhance current insights into the factors shaping perceived crime seriousness.

Authors

• Marieke Kluin, Leiden University

• Jelle Brands, Leiden University

• Lisa Ansems, Leiden University