Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Rigours Testing in Criminological Research

Fri, September 13, 3:30 to 4:45pm, Faculty of Law, University of Bucharest, Floor: 1st floor, Room 2.14

Session Submission Type: Pre-arranged Panel

Abstract

While theories in criminology are (often) quite explicit about their causal models, tests of these models could often not mimic the theoretical precision. In the worst case, this leads to questioning whether the results speak at all to the assumed model. Besides all other challenges for empirical research, we aim to question and, at best, to improve the match between models and actual tests regarding, e.g., research designs and statistical modeling. Each presentation shows an approach to improve tests by aiming for a more rigorous fit between theoretical assumptions and implications for testing. The presentation by Yastrebov/Trinidad /Leopold disentangles the relationship between age, period, and cohorts (APC) regarding public concerns about crime in Germany. Becher /Mehlkop /Sattler test with a scenario-based 2x2 design the General Aggression Model (GAM) while recognizing a mediated moderation between provocation, internal state, and social status. Hasselhorn tests the often overlooked aspect of motivation within Wikstöm’s Situational Action Theory (SAT) while focusing on and testing for different statistical modeling strategies. Ernst /Trinidad recognize the systematic selection of people into different settings and the following implications for testing the interplay between crime propensity and settings criminogeneity in a simulation study.

Subtopic

Chair

Individual Presentations