Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Room
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Session Submission Type: Pre-arranged Panel
Ever since the 1909 study by Otto and Sharp, scholars have sought to understand how the public would punish criminal offenders if they were the judge. To shed a new light on this question, our panel will discuss sentencing vignettes included in the criminological module of the Central European Social Survey (CESS). Drawing on repeated-measure data representative of six jurisdictions, our presentations will delve into the levels of public punitiveness, its socio-political predictors and the stability of punishment preferences across time.
Punitiveness in six European countries - Paweł Ostaszewski, University of Warsaw and Institute of Justice, Poland; Dagmara Woźniakowska, University of Warsaw; Andrzej Uhl, University of Cambridge
Religion, religiosity and harsh attitudes toward offenders - Alexander Fürstenberg, Heidelberg University; Andrzej Uhl, University of Cambridge
Punitive authoritarians? Challenging the dual-process model of punitiveness - Malia Marks, University of Cambridge; Andrzej Uhl, University of Cambridge; Paweł Ostaszewski, University of Warsaw and Institute of Justice, Poland
On the stability of individual punishment preferences: A longitudinal, cross-national study - Andrzej Uhl, University of Cambridge; Justin T. Pickett, University at Albany, SUNY