- Browse/Search the Program
Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Room
- Information Menu
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
- Navigation and Settings Menu
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Cyber-victimization of LGBTIQ+ individuals in Switzerland: Experiences, Challenges, and Recommendations for Improved Support and Response
Fri, September 5, 3:30 to 4:45pm, Deree | Classrooms, DC 702Abstract
In the context of rising global violence against LGBTIQ+ individuals, this study explores the cyber-victimisation of LGBTIQ+ people in Switzerland. The primary objective of the project is to identify specific experiences of online victimization within these populations, analyse risk and protective factors, and strengthen response and support mechanisms through targeted recommendations.
A qualitative, two-phase methodology was employed for this project. The first phase involved interviews with professionals from various sectors linked to LGBTIQ+ issues. The second phase consisted of semi-structured interviews with LGBTIQ+ individuals who have been targets or victims of digital abuse.
The findings reveal that LGBTIQ+ individuals face a range of online abuses, often targeted due to their non-cis-heteronormative gender identity or sexual orientation, including outing and homophobic or transphobic cyber-raids. Most interviewees choose to restrict their online visibility by using private accounts, limiting the exposure of their personal lives, or carefully assessing the risks before disclosing personal information.
The study also highlights a significant reluctance among LGBTIQ+ individuals to engage law enforcement in response to online abuse. Due to widespread beliefs and negative, re-victimizing experiences, many perceive that authorities lack the resources, training, and capacity to address digital offenses related to gender identities and sexual orientations. This skepticism is further fueled by the perception of insufficient deterrence, the impunity of perpetrators, and the inadequacy of the legal framework in addressing these issues. Additionally, the reporting mechanisms are generally not considered optimal. The paper concludes with concrete recommendations aimed at restoring trust, providing more effective support, and simplifying access to justice for all.