Challenging Credibility: Institutional Barriers and Biases in addressing LGBTQ+ Intimate Partner Violence

• In Event: Victimisation and punishment of LGTQ+

Abstract

Intimate Partner Violence is widely recognized as a form of gender-based violence, yet its legal and institutional frameworks have historically been shaped by heteronormative assumptions (Hearn, 2013; Nash et al., 2024). While the Istanbul Convention (2011) has broadened the definition of domestic violence, justice systems continue to rely on models primarily designed for heterosexual relationships, leaving IPV within LGBTQ+ partnerships underexamined and poorly addressed (Goodmark, 2013; Guadalupe-Diaz, 2019). This study explores how justice professionals and victim support organizations perceive and handle IPV in LGBTQ+ relationships, focusing on credibility assessment, access to protection measures, and the structural availability of support services.
The research was conducted across three Italian regions by three academic institutions, using semi-structured qualitative interviews with legal professionals (judges and lawyers) and representatives of organizations working in IPV prevention and response. Additionally, focus groups were conducted to identify shared perceptions and systemic barriers.
Preliminary findings suggest that LGBTQ+ IPV victims often face institutional invisibility, shaped by stereotypical assumptions about gender, power, and victimhood (Finneran & Stephenson, 2013; Nash et al., 2024). Many professionals apply heteronormative frameworks that result in the misclassification of cases and restricted access to legal protections. Furthermore, while grassroots organizations provide some support, there is no cohesive institutional response tailored to LGBTQ+ victims' specific needs.
These findings underscore the need for further research on the intersection between legal definitions, professional biases, and the structural barriers affecting LGBTQ+ IPV survivors. Future studies should investigate how alternative legal frameworks and policy adaptations could ensure more inclusive and effective protection measures. A deeper exploration of the role of training and institutional culture in shaping professional responses could also provide valuable insights for improving justice system practices.

Authors

• Elisa Begnis, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna

• Sandra Sicurella, University of Bologna (Italy)