Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Room
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
The present study analyses the implementation of the Circles of Support and Accountability (CoSA) project in Spain, focusing on the selection and training processes of volunteers, Central Members (MCs), and Coordinators. The research covers the first two years of the project's development (2021-2022) and evaluates its adherence to the guidelines established in the Circles Manual.
One of the primary difficulties encountered in the early stages of the project was the selection of volunteers, as multiple entities were involved, making it challenging to centralize information efficiently. Improvements were observed in documentation management compared to the previous year, but gaps remain in registering volunteers who access the project through alternative channels.
Secondly, the analysis of MC selection revealed that the typical profile of participants aligns with international research: Spanish males, approximately 40 years old, predominantly single or divorced, with basic or medium-level education. While only a limited number of cases were examined, findings suggest a similarity between the Spanish implementation and international models.
The selection process for Coordinators was evaluated based on data from the first four years of the program. The findings indicate that the profile of Spanish Coordinators aligns with European standards, predominantly comprising women in their mid-30s with university degrees. Most Coordinators had prior experience in forensic, judicial, or correctional settings, reinforcing their suitability for the role.
The findings of this study highlight both the strengths and challenges of implementing the CoSA project in Spain. While progress has been made in standardizing processes, ongoing efforts are needed to address remaining gaps. The alignment of MC and Coordinator profiles with international research suggests that the Spanish adaptation follows global trends, though further analysis is necessary to assess long-term effectiveness. These insights contribute to the broader European discussion on best practices for the rehabilitation and reintegration of individuals with sexual offenses.