Between Integrity and Exposure: The Psychology of Insider Disclosure

• In Event: Euroc - Reporting, investigating and prosecuting crimes

Abstract

This study examined the psychological, ethical, and situational factors that influence voluntary disclosure of organisational information. While existing research on information leaks has primarily focused on cybersecurity threats and accidental breaches, this study investigated intentional disclosures driven by ethical convictions, ideological beliefs, discrimination, personal grievances, and financial incentives. Using a mixed-methods approach, an anonymous online survey (n=292) was conducted, integrating descriptive statistical analysis with reflexive thematic and content analysis.
Findings revealed a complex interplay between motivational drivers and deterrents, demonstrating that ethical concerns can simultaneously promote and prevent disclosure. Group influence emerged as a significant factor, with social validation and consensus increasing the likelihood of disclosure in some cases while discouraging it in others. Additionally, the study introduced two new theoretical models: Ethical Retaliation Theory (ERT), which explains how individuals justify revenge-driven disclosures as morally legitimate, and the Dual Motivational Conflict Model (DMCM), which illustrates how ethical reasoning can function as both a motivator and deterrent depending on situational framing.
These findings underscore the need for organisations to foster ethical cultures, enhance internal reporting mechanisms, and build employee trust to reduce the risk of external leaks. Future research should explore the intersection of group dynamics, ideological conflicts, and ethical decision-making in disclosure behaviour.

Author

• Dion Glass, University of Portsmouth