P091. Psychopathological profiles and coercion trajectories of abusive partners

• In Event: Poster Session & Ice Cream Social

Abstract

Numerous typological studies on the psychopathological characteristics of violent partners show that they do not constitute a homogeneous group. Most empirical research aiming to identify types of violent partners tends to converge on three main groups: the violent and antisocial group, the borderline group, and the non-pathological group. These groups are distinguished by their characteristics and risk factors associated with intimate partner violence. Despite identifying risk factors and various psychopathological characteristics, our understanding remains limited due to a lack of knowledge about the trajectories of violence among violent partners. Much existing work focuses on childhood experiences of violence, neglecting the evolution of violent behaviors since early adulthood. Analyzing these trajectories in an intimate context could reveal dynamic patterns shaped by multiple factors.

This study aims to develop a typology of violent partners based on their personality characteristics under Axis II of the DSM-V and to verify whether our classification aligns with or differs from pre-existing typologies. We compared the profiles of violent partners using psychometric tools measuring psychopathy, impulsivity, criminal thinking styles, and the type of violence perpetrated in intimate relationships. Finally, we conducted path analyses to examine whether violent partners follow specific violence trajectories.

The study focuses on 121 incarcerated violent partners in Quebec, among whom 100 perpetrated physical and psychological violence, and 21 committed sexual violence. Data were obtained from semi-structured interviews, psychometric instruments, and official reports. Our analyses identified three subtypes of violent partners: the Borderline, characterized by emotional instability and the highest rates of sexual violence; the Sadistic/Antisocial, who exercises coercive control and uses multiple types of violence to maintain dominance; and the Non-Pathological, suggesting other factors must be considered to explain violence in an intimate context.

Authors

• ALEXANDRE PAVY, ÉCOLE DE CRIMINOLOGIE DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL

• Jean Proulx, UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL