Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
About Seattle
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Most online news media today enable and encourage their readers to comment on published content and discuss covered issues. Spontaneous discussions on these platforms among anonymous and intrinsically involved citizens have a high potential for public deliberation. This potential, however, may be lowered in practice by the behavior of the discussants. As civility, respect, and sincerity are generally considered prerequisites for successful deliberation, destructive online behavior such as flaming and trolling are expected to be detrimental to deliberative discussions. In this study we conduct an extensive and fine-grained content analysis of deliberative quality in comment threads on the two major Swiss news websites to investigate the influence of destructive comments in detail. Findings suggest that incivility and insincerity are less harmful to the quality of debates than deliberative theory would suggest. Contrary to expectations, personal attacks are found to increase the deliberative quality of subsequent comments.