New Models and Conflicts in the Interconnection and Delivery of Internet-Mediated Content

• In Event: Assessing Internet Access: Content, Connection, and Speed

Abstract

As the Internet has evolved, interconnection terms and conditions between Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”) have diversified. Content Delivery Networks offer downstream video, all but guaranteeing an imbalance between downstream and upstream traffic which typically triggers a demand for higher compensation from the carriers delivering increased volume. When commercial disputes become protracted, issues of fairness, network neutrality and the need for regulatory intervention arises.

This paper will examine existing and likely future interconnection disputes with an eye toward identifying when and how conflicts can get resolved. The paper supports commercially driven negotiations, but suggests that regulatory authorities may need to arbitrate and promote settlements when now essential Internet access becomes blocked or congested. The paper concludes that ISPs should have the opportunity to provide both end users and content sources alternatives to “best efforts” content delivery, but that they should not create artificial congestion as justification for additional compensation.

Author

• Robert M. Frieden, Pennsylvania State U