Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
About Seattle
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The present study explored rational-experiential processing and consistency effects on attitudes and driving performance. The author suggested that priming people to think rationally or experientially influences them to be more attentive to information that is either in a cognitive or affective form. A 2 x 2 between-participants design (N = 120) found that people’s attitudes and behavior were affected by their experimentally induced information processing modes (rational vs. experiential) and a message frame (“I think…” vs. “I feel…”) they received while they were driving. Drivers who received a message frame that matched their driving state judged the quality of a car higher, showed greater attitudes toward eco-driving law legislation, and made less driving mistakes than those who did not. The results have important theoretical and practical implications for the design of car user interfaces.