Goals, Tactics, and Their Effects on Relational Satisfaction in Serial Arguments: A Comparison of Long-Distance and Geographically Close Romantic Relationships

• In Event: Distance Makes the Heart Grow Fonder! OR Does It?: Investigating Long Distance Relationships

Abstract

This study reports the results of an investigation comparing serial argument behaviors (i.e., goals and tactics) and relational satisfaction following a serial argument episode in geographically close (n = 304) and long distance (n = 296) romantic relationships. Results indicate expressing positive feelings, hurting the other, and terminating the relationship are more important goals for individuals in long distance relationships, that individuals in such relationships use more avoidance and less integrative tactics, and that they are less satisfied with their relationship following an argument episode of their argument than individuals in geographically close relationships. Results also indicate that goals predict tactics, and tactics predict relational satisfaction for both types of relationships, although relatively different connections (i.e., significant paths from one variable to the other) are at work for each type of relationship, with subsequent differences in the effects goals and tactics have on relational satisfaction.

Authors

• Ioana A. Cionea, University of Oklahoma

• Stacie Wilson Mumpower, U of Oklahoma

• Megan Bassick, University of Oklahoma