Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Politicians face a significant risk to their image and interests when targeting messages to both domestic and foreign audiences, particularly within the context of identity conflicts. While the presentation of consistent messages can impair domestic solidarity and cultural proximity in the international arena, the presentation of disparate messages entails potential damage to a politician's credibility. This study provides a basis for understanding the impacting factors that result in politicians choosing to utilize message consistencies or gaps. Based on both quantitative and qualitative analysis of 644 messages presented by Israeli officials with respect to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict over three different periods (1967-1973, 1993-2000, and 2009-2012), the study points to bilateral relations defined by the existence of negotiations, rather than mediatization processes or the nature of the system of government, as the significant factor that coaxes political leaders to utilize message gaps.
Elie Friedman, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Zohar Kampf, Hebrew University
Meital Balmas, Hebrew U of Jerusalem