Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Though anti-drinking and driving campaigns are prevalent in the media, many are not effective. A more nuanced understanding of why these messages fail is important to help develop more effective campaigns. The present study examines this relationship and proposes message reactance as an explanation for why messages have differential effects. The study found that a more accessible anti-drinking and driving norm led to less reactance and less intention to drink and drive. Less accessible norms led to increased reactance, more favorable attitudes and higher intention to drink and drive. Implications for persuasion are discussed.