Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Researchers have been concerned that the scientific community is not as influential as it could be in science policy discourse. It has been proposed that narrative, the use of story telling to communicate information, is a viable communication strategy. This paper examines the proposed use of narrative within science communication by discussing narrative rationality advocated by Walt Fisher, Fisher’s belief that narrative is a necessary form of discourse within science, and whether narrative rationality allows science to reason paraxial knowledge. This paper carefully evaluates the Aristotelian concept of phronesis to reveal that narrative does not facilitate practical wisdom and cannot contribute to science communication's goal of becoming more influential in science policy discourse, nor is it adequately constructed to facilitate a credible and meaningful answer to the issue of whether.