Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Panel
Past research suggests that audiences’ media habits contribute to establish different forms of connection with public issues. For instance, Couldry, Markham and Livingstone (2010: 3) conclude in the book “Media Consumption and Public Engagement” that individuals share an orientation to a public world “where matters of shared concern are, or at least should be, addressed” and that this “public connection” is also sustained through audiences’ media consumption patterns. Even though this finding was obtained before the emergency of social media, as well as the expansion of smart phone use, its relevance for media and journalism studies remains as a framework to understand the relation between citizens and democracy. Furthermore, the contribution of the project was methodological and it opened up a possibility for international assessments of the mediated nature of public connection in various cultural contexts. Based on diaries recording individuals’ perspectives on public issues, as well as their everyday habits of media consumption; in-depth interviews and surveys, this panel is based on different studies across varied countries using and developing the methodological approach. The panel explores, with a comparative approach, the way audiences get involved with public issues through different forms of media in Chile, Mexico, Finland and Denmark. Different media environments – sometimes saturated by devices, platforms, and information – offer a possibility to assess the theory on public connection and analyze current media-related practices that offer a possibility for public orientation in various contexts. As Couldry (2010: 37) suggests, a practice approach asks “what are people doing in relation to media” across varied contexts and situations. In this vein the panel discusses, to what extent news and information, as a result of audiences’ varied media practices, are resources for socialization? Through which media practices audiences establish a connection with public issues? This panel thus offers four different case studies based on quantitative and qualitative approaches to critically examine audiences’ relation with public issues through their media practices in different national contexts.
Public Connection and Social Networks: Citizenship, Deliberation, and Engagement in Mexico - Manuel Alejandro Guerrero Martinez, U Iberoamericana
News-Based Public Connection in Finland: Will the Relationship Last? - Laura Ahva, U of Tampere; Heikki Heikkila, University of Tampere
Building News Media Repertoires as Resources for Public Connection - Kim Christian Schroder, Roskilde U
Chileans Media Practices and Media Pluralism From the Bottom-Up - Arturo Arriagada, Universidad Diego Portales; Teresa Correa, Universidad Diego Portales; Andres Scherman, U Diego Portales