Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
For more than a decade, social media platforms have provided networked infrastructures for the flow of news and information. These infrastructures, however, are not neutral in that platforms shape information flows in alignment with their politics (Gillespie, 2010) – business models, competitive strategies, and governing values – which are subsequently realised through their technological architecture. Drawing on emerging frameworks in platform and software studies, I examine two case studies: Facebook’s Trending section and Twitter’s Moments tab, to recognise how platforms influence information flows relating to breaking news and popular headlines. Using José van Djick and Thomas Poell’s (2013) principles of social media logic, I identify how these platforms act as gatekeepers through a combination of authoritative curation and algorithmic personalisation. The resulting social media news landscape steers users toward information exchange within a single platform, bolstering company profits, and favours particular news stories while excluding perspectives represented elsewhere across the web.
References:
van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14. doi:10.12924/mac2013.01010002
Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of “platforms.” New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. doi:10.1177/1461444809342738