Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This study uses a multidimensional risk definition to analyze how mass media cover nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is beneficial to society in many ways but also comes with a certain probability to be detrimental. The empirical risk of this study considers these “positive” and “negative” sides of the technology when studying how the coverage of this technology looks. By applying this model to a period of five years of coverage the different risk dimensions help picturing changing media coverage and a phase pattern in the coverage. This risk attention phase model is not only relevant to show how media coverage changes over time and is influenced by detrimental events such as Fukushima, but it also carries important evidence considering the political phase model. Moreover this innovative way to study risk holds promising solutions to some of the field’s struggles, e.g. the disadvantage of non-comparable risk coverage studies.