Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Although uncivil political discourse has increasingly become an object of study for mass communication and political science researchers, there exists precious little consensus on what is and what is not uncivil discourse. Therefore, the goal of this study was to draw upon established empirical operationalizations of incivility as a means of better understanding how the various features of uncivil talk relate to one another. The results of a regularized partial correlation network indicated the most central nodes in the variable network were the self-reported desire to exclude political opponents from deliberation and the desire to discredit one’s perceived political opponents. Conversely, the results suggested that use of threat and the purposeful attempt to undermine faith in the democratic system were the least central nodes.