Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This paper offers a critical test of three factors predicting selective exposure to news articles about sociopolitical issues. Two original selection studies on systematic samples of adult Americans examined whether prior attitudes, source credibility, and/or individual social identity drive the selection of political content. Both studies offered articles that were (1) pro- or counter-attitudinal with regard to individual prior attitudes on two political issues, and from (2) high versus low credibility sources conceptualized in two different ways, and (3) featuring participants’ social ingroup or outgroup, based on two different social groups. Unobtrusively logged behavioral selection data suggest that prior attitudes, and their strength and importance in Study 1, more strongly predict pro-attitudinal exposure than both source credibility and social identity.