Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This article represents the first attempt to examine the effects of political scandals via meta-analysis. Seventy-four studies collectively including more than 54.000 participants were identified and examined. A quantitative analysis revealed that the number of studies has steadily increased. Research predominantly stems from North America and Europe. More than two-thirds of studies are based on student samples. Publication outlets are mostly political science and psychology journals, while communication journals only play a minor role. A qualitative analysis shows that two central outcome variables are frequently studied (evaluation of politicians/electoral consequences). Overall, studies generally reveal negative evaluative effects for politicians. However, five central moderators (candidate characteristics and behaviors/prior attitudes/context/scandal type) significantly influence scandal effects. It also becomes apparent that research has largely neglected to precisely conceptualize the major independent variable in scandal effects studies: News coverage and its intensity. Central research gaps are identified and avenues for future research are discussed.