Argumentation Traits, Argumentative Competence, and Satisfaction in Friend and Stranger Dyadic Exchanges

• In Event: Managing Conflict and Negative Events

Abstract

This manuscript aims to clarify the role of argumentative competence in interpersonal dyadic exchanges. Specifically, the present study examines connections between argument effectiveness and appropriateness (the sub-dimensions of competence), argumentative traits, and situational features, as well as subsequent effects of competence on argument satisfaction. In addition, self-perceived versus observed argument competence were compared. Participants in the study (N = 50 dyads) completed measures before and after a face-to-face argumentative discussion with another person about one of two possible topics (student athlete pay and texting while driving). Results revealed that argumentation traits did not affect argumentative competence, but competence was correlated with situational features and differed based on sex. Argument satisfaction depended only on arguers’ own competence, not their partners. Finally, a perceptual bias existed regarding argument effectiveness (but not appropriateness) in that participants evaluated themselves more positively in this respect. These results are discussed in the context of interpersonal communication.

Authors

• Ioana A. Cionea, U of Oklahoma

• Cameron Wade Piercy, U of Kansas

• Stacie Wilson Mumpower, U of Oklahoma

• Eryn Nichole Bostwick, The U of Oklahoma