Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Harassments, insults, and threats online can result in serious consequences for those who have been bullied. Although bystanders (i.e., those observing the incident) could prevent the victim from serious harm, they often remain silent. Based on approaches to explain bystander behavior offline as well as Just World Theory, we aim at investigating the perceptual mechanisms that inhib-it bystanders to help a victim of cyberbullying. Drawing on an online-experiment with 240 partici-pants, we show that an incident containing threats (compared to insults alone) is more likely as-sessed as severe, which in turn leads to a higher willingness to help the victim. Yet, an incident that is evaluated as less severe results in a higher tendency to blame the victim, which in turn may in-hibit bystanders’ social support. Results indicate that victims of seemingly less severe incidents are at risk of being victimized a second time.
Christina Koehler, U of Mainz
Mathias Weber, Department of Communication / Johannes Gutenberg U of Mainz