Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This study explores how aggregate agenda-setting effects of media salience of issues unfold on a day-to-day basis and how the time-lags between media impulse and public response differ between issues. To account for between-issue differences in likelihood and strength of agenda-setting effects, it explores the impact of intensity of baseline coverage and the momentum of news waves on agenda-setting effects. It concludes that agenda-setting effects grow more likely and stronger the higher the baseline amount of coverage and the higher the momentum of news waves. Agenda-setting scholars should systematically check, report, and possibly control for baseline coverage and spike momentum, which can easily be implemented in agenda-setting studies of the natural history type.