Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Is attitude induced by narratives able to resist the influence of competing messages? Can narratives effectively persuade individuals when used for counter persuasion? In the context of a health campaign advocating radiotherapy, the study examined these questions employing a 2 (Initial message: narrative vs. rhetorical) × 2 (Subsequent competing message: narrative vs. rhetorical) × 2 (Time: post-message1 vs. post-message2) mixed-design experiment (N = 457). Findings revealed that the narrative pro-radiotherapy message not only enhanced the immediate issue attitude, but also produced a carryover impact on attitude after exposure to the subsequent competing message. The carryover impact was generated via two distinct pathways. Enhanced memory accessibility was critical to the cognitive route; the heightened narrative engagement, self-referencing, and counter-arguing with the subsequent message explained the experiential process. Moreover, the narrative competing message elicited a greater attitude change than the rhetorical competing message. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.