Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Through an online, nationally representative survey of 1,164 participants, this study examined how individuals perceive and cope with the threat of infectious disease outbreaks, in order to inform risk and crisis communications strategies for health organizations. This study explored how individuals’ threat appraisals (perceived controllability, perceived predictability, and perceived responsibility) and their cognitive (i.e., information seeking) and conative coping (i.e., protective actions) differ by infectious disease threat type (i.e. airborne, bloodborne, foodborne, sexually transmitted, waterborne, or zoonotic/vectorborne) in epidemic situations. Findings revealed that IDT types varied significantly based on individuals’ appraisals of predictability, controllability, and responsibility for different disease types. Across all disease types, however, predictability appeared to be the most impactful factor related to participants’ information seeking and planned protective action taking.
Lucinda L. Austin, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Yan Jin, U of Georgia
Brooke Fisher Liu, U of Maryland
Seoyeon Kim, UNC