Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Division
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Health agencies are grappling with challenges of communicating the risks of e-cigarettes to cigarettes. While e-cigarettes are less harmful than combustible cigarettes, they are not harmless. Messages that frame e-cigarettes as a less harmful option could be beneficial if smokers who were otherwise unwilling to quit switched to e-cigarettes completely. However, these messages might have unintended effects, such as increased dual use. We hypothesized that in order to minimize the unintended consequences, messages communicating reduced risk of e-cigarettes should have a strong anti-smoking component. Through an online experiment, we examined smokers’ responses to messages communicating only less risks of e-cigarettes to cigarettes and to messages communicating both less risks of e-cigarettes and negative consequences of smoking. We found both messages fostered correct relative risk perceptions about e-cigarettes and neither tended to have unintended consequences. The two messages differed in message evaluations and perceived effectiveness. Theoretical and practical implications were discussed.