Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Theme Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Sweden's Official Site
Conference Home Page
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Context, concepts and SE typology
This paper follows the framework and the proposed work plan of the International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project. More precisely, we first review the ways the notion of social enterprise and related concepts are understood in Finland as well as the influence of various schools of thought (Dees, 1998; Defourny & Nyssens, 2012; Kerlin, 2006). Then we propose a typology which consists of a) social enterprises providing public welfare services, b) emerging alternative economic initiatives, c) impact businesses and smart-ups, and d) social impact investors.
Data collection
For data collection and analysis, we then select emblematic cases from each category of the typology (a, b, c and d) which are described in-depth To build a reliable data set concerning these cases, we combine interviews based on the ICSEM questionnaire, publicly available registers, and some other databases. On such a basis, we also analyze the respective institutionalization processes of each SE category as well as their eco-systems.
Expected impacts
This research makes a threefold contribution. First, it develops an empirically grounded typology of social enterprises which adds to the knowledge of the field in Finland. It paves the way to international comparative analyses. Finally, this study serves Finnish practitioners to better understand the emerging eco-system and the diverse forms and needs of social enterprises.
References
Dees, G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb., 54–67.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2012). Conceptions of Social Enterprise in Europe: A Comparative Perspective with the United States. In B. Gidron & Y. Hasenfeld (Eds.), Social Enterprises: An Organizational Perspective (Vol. 1, pp. 71–90). Palgrave Macmillian.
Houtbeckers, E. (2014). Yhteiskunnallisen yrittäjyyden toimijoiden kirjo Suomessa [Social entrepreneurship actors in Finland]. Tieteessä tapahtuu, 32(3), 7–11.
Kerlin, J. A. (2006). Social Enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and Learning from the Differences. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 17(3), 246–262. doi:10.1007/s11266-006-9016-2
Kostilainen, H., & Grönberg, V. (2013). Understanding startup and success of work integration social enterprises in Finland. In H. Kostilainen & P. Pättiniemi (Eds.), Avauksia yhteiskunnallisen yritystoiminnan tutkimukseen: FinSERN 1.
Kostilainen, H., & Tykkyläinen, S. (2015). The Characteristics of Finnish Social Enterprise. In H. Kostilainen & P. Pättiniemi (Eds.), FinSERN 2. Konferenssijulkaisu.
Pättiniemi, P. (2006). A plurality of logics behind Finnish social enterprises. In M. Nyssens (Ed.), Social enterprise (pp. 157–166). London: Routledge.