Implementing ‘defund the police’: How state-nonprofit funding dynamics constrain liberation from state oppression

• In Event: Transformative Dynamics: Reimagining Evidence, Organizational Agency and Societal Change

Abstract

Since 2020, multiple US cities—in response to police killings of BIPOC people and related social movements for change—have defunded the police and reinvested resources in nonprofit and community-based services. Yet, far from being distinct systems, contemporary US carceral and social service systems operate in convergent ways to socially control and criminalize racialized communities that live under a regime of state-sponsored poverty (Soss et al., 2011; Wacquant, 2009). Research shows that state-based funding to social service organizations can contribute to the ongoing collaboration between these systems during service design and implementation (Simes et al., 2022). Indeed, critical and abolitionist scholarship suggests that liberation from state oppression may be undermined through resource-based ties between the state and nonprofit social service organizations (Gilmore, 2007; Smith, 2007), which underscores how nonprofits can be sites that perpetuate inequity and oppression (Flanigan, 2022). As police defunding remains a core strategy of abolitionist organizing (Ritchie, 2022), evidence is needed to understand the state-nonprofit funding dynamics activated through police defunding and how these dynamics contribute to further carcerality or liberation from state oppression. As such, this paper asks: what are the funding dynamics between municipal government and local nonprofit social service systems in cities that have defunded the police?

A comparative case study was conducted of two cities that have taken substantial steps to transform local public safety services, including through defunding the police. Primary methods included a 21-month virtual ethnography of each city’s transformation process and fifty qualitative interviews of relevant organizational actors, including nonprofit social service administrators and frontline service providers, police, public administrators, social movement activists, and funders. Using pattern coding and thematic analysis (Saldaña, 2016), ethnographic observation and interviews were used to identify and understand the funding dynamics in social service systems that were the direct recipients of former police resources.

Qualitative analysis revealed that police defunding activated three primary state-nonprofit funding dynamics: contracting and collaboration, organizational competition, and public accountability. These dynamics were heavily influenced by interorganizational and inter-sector relationships, as well as funding mandates and state policy. While police defunding contributed to supporting non-carceral public safety alternatives, it also activated funding dynamics that perpetuated several challenges that are core to abolitionist aims. These included funding dynamics that supported ongoing or new collaboration between service providers and police, prioritized established social service organizations over community-based innovation, and obfuscated the work of key social service organizations involved in public safety.

When liberation from state oppression involves resource-based strategies like police defunding, it is imperative to pay attention to funding dynamics on-the-ground. As such, this paper contributes to advocacy efforts for non-carceral public safety services by uncovering the black box of resource implementation when funding for those services comes through the state and towards nonprofit organizations. As an alternative to state-based resources, mutual aid is a primary abolitionist tool that can reduce police collaboration, support multiple and novel community-based alternatives, and improve community accountability.

References

Akbar, A. A. (2020). An abolitionist horizon for (police) reform. Calif. L. Rev., 108, 1781-1846.
Anasti, T. (2020). “Officers are doing the best they can”: Concerns around law enforcement and social service collaboration in service provision to sex workers. Affilia, 35(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919889034
Bass, S. (2001). Policing space, policing race: Social control imperatives and police discretionary decisions. Social Justice, 28(1 (83), 156–176.
Beckett, K., & Western, B. (2001). Governing social marginality: Welfare, incarceration, and the transformation of state policy. Punishment & Society, 3(1), 43–59.
Bell, M. C. (2017). Police reform and the dismantling of legal estrangement. The Yale Law Journal, 126(7), 2054–2150.
Benjamin, L. M., & Campbell, D. C. (2015). Nonprofit performance: Accounting for the agency of clients. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(5), 988–1006.
Braga, A. A., Brunson, R. K., & Drakulich, K. M. (2019). Race, place, and effective policing. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 535–555.
Brodkin, E. Z. (2008). Accountability in street-level organizations. Intl Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 317–336.
Brydolf-Horwitz, M., & Beckett, K. (2021). Welfare, punishment, and social marginality: understanding the connections. In The Politics of Inequality (Vol. 28, pp. 91–111). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432
Dias, J. J., & Maynard-Moody, S. (2007). For-profit welfare: Contracts, conflicts, and the performance paradox. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 189–211.
Feldman, G. (2021). Social work and the state: Perspectives and practice. Social Policy & Administration, 55(5), 879–890.
Fixler, A. L., Jacobs, L. A., & Davis, C. D. (2023). Police-social work collaboration and the ethical practice paradox: Perspectives from social work’s next generation. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 35(1).
Flanigan, S. T. (2022). Critical applications of heterogeneity theories to power in nonprofit human services organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(4), 857-877.
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford University Press.
Franke, N. D., & Shdaimah, C. (2022). ‘I have different goals than you, we can’t be a team’: Navigating the tensions of a courtroom workgroup in a prostitution diversion program. Ethics and Social Welfare, 16(2), 193–205.
Garland, D. (2012). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. University of Chicago Press.
Gilmore, R. W. (2007). Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. University of California Press.
Hasenfeld, Y. (2010). Organizational responses to social policy: The case of welfare reform. Administration in Social Work, 34(2), 148–167.
Hinton, E. (2016). From the war on poverty to the war on crime: The making of mass incarceration in America. Harvard University Press.
Jacobs, L. A., Kim, M. E., Whitfield, D. L., Gartner, R. E., Panichelli, M., Kattari, S. K., Downey, M. M., McQueen, S. S., & Mountz, S. E. (2021). Defund the police: Moving towards an anti-carceral social work. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 32(1), 37–62.
Kaba, M., & Ritchie, A. J. (2022). No more police: A case for abolition. The New Press.
Katz, M. B. (1996). In the shadow of the poorhouse: A social history of welfare in America. Basic Books.
Kaye, K. (2019). Enforcing freedom: Drug courts, therapeutic communities, and the intimacies of the state. Columbia University Press.
Kim, M. E. (2018). From carceral feminism to transformative justice: Women-of-color feminism and alternatives to incarceration. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 27(3), 219–233.
Kim, M. E. (2020). The carceral creep: Gender-based violence, race, and the expansion of the punitive state, 1973–1983. Social Problems, 67(2), 251–269.
Kim, M. E., Chung, M., Hassan, S., & Ritchie, A. J. (2021). Defund the police – invest in community care: A guide to alternative mental health responses. Interrupting Criminalization | Research In Action. https://www.interruptingcriminalization.com/non-police-crisis-response-guide
Kohler-Hausmann, I. (2018). Misdemeanorland: Criminal courts and social control in an age of broken windows policing. Princeton University Press.
Marwell, N., & Brown, M. (2020). Towards a governance framework for government-nonprofit relations. The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 227–250.
Marwell, N. P., & Morrissey, S. L. (2020). Organizations and the governance of urban poverty. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 233–250.
Maynard-Moody, S. W., & Musheno, M. C. (2022). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805431
Moulton, S., & Sandfort, J. R. (2017). The strategic action field framework for policy implementation research. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 144–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12147
Murray, B. J., Copeland, V., & Dettlaff, A. J. (2023). Reflections on the ethical possibilities and limitations of abolitionist praxis in social work. Affilia, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099221146151
Patterson, G. T., & Swan, P. G. (2019). Police social work and social service collaboration strategies one hundred years after Vollmer: A systematic review. Policing: An International Journal, 42(5), 863–886.
Phelps, M. S., & Ruhland, E. L. (2022). Governing marginality: Coercion and care in probation. Social Problems, 69(3), 799–816.
Phelps, M. S., Ward, A., & Frazier, D. (2021). From Police reform to police abolition? How Minneapolis activists fought to make Black Lives Matter. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 26(4), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-26-4-421
Prowse, G., Weaver, V. M., & Meares, T. L. (2020). The state from below: Distorted responsiveness in policed communities. Urban Affairs Review, 56(5), 1423–1471.
Ray, V. (2019). A Theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418822335
Richie, B. E., & Martensen, K. M. (2020). Resisting carcerality, embracing Abolition: Implications for feminist social work practice. Affilia, 35(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919897576
Rios, V. M. (2006). The hyper-criminalization of Black and Latino male youth in the era of mass incarceration. Souls, 8(2), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999940600680457
Ritchie, A. J. (2021). The demand is still #DefundThePolice: lessons from 2020. Community Resource Hub. https://communityresourcehub.org/resources/the-demand-is-still-defundthepolice-lessons-from-2020/
Ritchie, A. J. (2022). The struggle continues. https://www.interruptingcriminalization.com/struggle-continues
Rojas, F. (2019). Race and organization theory: Reflections and open questions. In Race, Organizations, and the Organizing Process (Vol. 60, pp. 15–23). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000060002
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. sage.
Schenwar, M., & Law, V. (2020). Prison by any other name: The harmful consequences of popular reforms. The New Press.
Scott, M., Sabatini, S., & Mama, R. (2023). Defund the police? Or reimagine the police? Leaders in law enforcement’s perspective on the role of social workers in law enforcement. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 20(2), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2022.2156831
Sherraden, M. (2020). Social work and the future of policing: Key points for changes in policy and practice (CSD Policy Brief No. 20-14). https://doi.org/10.7936/885H-RH13
Simes, J. T., & Tichenor, E. (2022). “We’re here to help”: Criminal justice collaboration among social service providers across the urban-rural continuum. Social Service Review, 96(2), 268–307.
Smith, A. (2007). Introduction: The revolution will not be funded. In INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence (Ed.), The revolution will not be funded: Beyond the non-profit industrial complex (pp. 1-20). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Schram, S. (2011). Disciplining the poor: Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race. University of Chicago Press.
Soss, J., & Weaver, V. (2017). Police are our government: Politics, political science, and the policing of race–class subjugated communities. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 565–591.
Sweet, P. L. (2023). Organizing penal-welfare hybridity: Trauma, vulnerability, and state recognition of crime victims. American Journal of Sociology, 128(6), 1678–1715. https://doi.org/10.1086/724379
Toraif, N., & Mueller, J. C. (2023). Abolitionist social work. In Encyclopedia of Social Work.
Vitale, A. (2021). The end of policing. Verso Books.
Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Duke University Press.
Wacquant, L. (2012). The wedding of workfare and prisonfare in the 21st century. Journal of Poverty, 16(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2012.695540
Wilson, B. L., Wooten, N. R., & Pitner, R. O. (2023). Examining historical and contemporary policing disparities in the black community: Implications for social work. Social Work, 68(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swac049
Wooten, M., & Hoffman, A. J. (2017). Organizational fields: Past, present and future. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, & R. Meyer, The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 55–72). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n3
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Authors

• Matthew Bakko

• Bethany Murray, University of California, Los Angeles