Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Charity Law & Blockchain Technology: Using Old Wineskins for New Wine?

Wed, July 17, 2:00 to 3:30pm, TBA

Abstract

This paper considers how charity law applies to new assets facilitated by blockchain technology. These assets include cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and ownership interests in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). These assets have become significant in numerous countries in terms of public attention and, at least with respect to cryptocurrencies, aggregate value. Charity regulators are therefore having to consider how charity law applies to them, particularly when donors contributes them to charities and claim related tax benefits. While several commentators have identified areas of uncertainty when it comes to this application (Coffey 2017; Moran 2019; Schlesinger & Auchincloss 2022), no commentators appear to have systematically considered how regulators should resolve those uncertainties, including possibly by modifying existing law.
This paper begins by describing these new assets and the initial attempts by regulators to apply existing laws to them, including reviewing the relevant literature. (Boss 2023; Britto & Castillo 2016; Brunson 2023; Frye 2023; Haynes & Yeoh 2020; Heminway 2023; Houben & Snyers 2018; Murray 2023; OECD 2021; Oh, Rosen & Zhang 2023) It then reviews the theoretical literature regarding interactions between law and new matters. (Brownsword 2008; Moses 2007; Moses 2013) It adapts that literature’s insights to identify the key questions in this context: (1) what are the goals of charity law with respect to assets dedicated to charitable purposes; (2) should those same goals apply to the new assets; (3) does existing charity law apply to the new assets in a manner that achieves those goals with sufficient certainty and comprehensiveness; and (4) if the answer to the third question is negative, how should existing law be modified to better achieve those goals with respect to the new assets.
This paper then answers these questions by examining the stated goals of charity law, including encouraging charitable activities, and particularly contributions to charities, while also preventing abuses. (Aprill 2013; CRS 2020; JCT 2005; JCT 2022) In addition, it considers whether any aspect of these new assets requires modifying those policy goals, concluding it does not. It then reviews actions already taken by regulators to apply existing tax laws to these new assets, including in a few instances tax laws relating to charities and charitable contributions. (Avi-Yonah & Salaimi 2022; Beale et al. 2023; Chason 2023; Chodorow 2016; Ooi 2021)
This analysis leads to the conclusion that the novelty of these assets does not require modifying existing charity law because as applied to them that law still adequately furthers charity law’s stated goals. But this analysis also identifies two areas where regulators may need to modify existing law or provide further guidance in the foreseeable future. First, if sufficiently reliable cryptocurrency exchanges emerge such that overvaluation abuses become unlikely, regulators
should relax the relatively onerous valuation requirements that apply under existing law to cryptocurrency donations. Second, if charities increasingly use blockchain technology, and particularly DAO structures, to further their charitable purposes, regulators should consider providing specific guidance for when doing so is (and is not) consistent with qualifying as a charity legally.

References

Aprill, E.P. (2013). Reforming the Charitable Contribution Substantiation Rules. Florida Tax Review 14, 275-318.
Avi-Yonah, R. & Salaimi, M. (2022). A New Framework for Taxing Cryptocurrencies. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4071391.
Beale, L.M. et al. (2023). Common Sense Recommendations for the Application of Tax Law to Digital Assets. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4576425.
Boss, S. (2023). DAOs: Legal and Empirical Review. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4503234.
Britto, J. & Castillo, A. (2016). Bitcoin: A Primer for Policymakers, Second Edition. Retrieved from: https://www.mercatus.org/research/books/bitcoin-primer-policymakers.
Brownsword, R. (2008). So What Does the World Need Now? Reflections on Regulating Technology. Regulating Technologies: Legal Futures, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes, 23-48. Portland, USA: Hart Publishing.
Brunson, S.D. (2023). Standing on the Shoulders of LLCs: Tax Entity Status and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations. Georgia Law Review 57, 603-649.
Chason, E.D (2023). Crypto Assets and the Problem of Tax Classifications. Washington University Law Review 100, 765-825.
Chodorow, A. (2016). Bitcoin and the Definition of Foreign Currency. Florida Tax Review 19, 365-398.
Coffey, J.T. (2017). Virtual Currency – What Charities and Donors Need to Know. Taxation of Exempts 29, 36-38.
Congressional Research Service (CRS) (2020). Tax Issues Relating to Charitable Contributions and Organizations. Retrieved from: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45922/6#:~:text=A%20temporary%20above%2Dthe%2Dline,116%2D136)..
Frye, B.L. (2023). A Brief History of NFTs. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4577014.
Haynes, A. & Yeoh, P. (2020). Cryptocurrencies and Cryptoassets: Regulatory and Legal Issues. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Heminway, J.M. (2023). Non-Investment Finance in an NFT World. The Cambridge Handbook on Law and Policy for NFTs (forthcoming). Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4554832.
Houben, R. & Snyers, A. (2018). Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain: Legal Context and Implications for Financial Crime, Money Laundering and Tax Evasion. Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/150761/TAX3%20Study%20on%20cryptocurrencies%20and%20blockchain.pdf.
Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) (2022). Present Law and Background Relating to the Federal Tax Treatment of Charitable Contributions. Retrieved from: https://www.jct.gov/publications/2022/jcx-2-22/.
Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) (2005). Historical Development and Present Law of the Federal Tax Exemption for Charities and Other Tax-Exempt Organizations. Retrieved from: https://www.jct.gov/publications/2005/jcx-29-05/.
Moran, C.N. (2019). Charitable Donations of Cryptocurrency: Is a Qualified Appraisal Necessary? Taxation of Exempts 31, 24-27.
Moses, L.B. (2013). How to Think about Law, Regulation and Technology: Problems with
“Technology” as a Regulatory Target. Law, Innovation & Technology 5, 1-20.
Moses, L.B. (2007). Recurring Dilemmas: The Law's Race to Keep up with Technological Change. University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy 2007, 239-285.
Murray, M.D. (2023). Transfers and Licensing of Copyrights to NFT Purchasers. Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy 6, 119-136.
OECD (2020). Taxing Virtual Currencies: An Overview of Tax Treatments and Emerging Tax Policy Issues. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/taxing-virtual-currencies-an-overview-of-tax-treatments-and-emerging-tax-policy-issues.htm.
Oh, S., Rosen, S. & Zhang, A.L. (2023). Digital Veblen Goods. Retrieved from: https://anthonyleezhang.github.io/pdfs/nft.pdf.
Ooi, V. (2021). A Framework for Understanding the Taxation of Digital Tokens. Australian Tax Review 50, 260-269.
Schlesinger, S.J. & Auchincloss, A.S. (2022). Review of Charitable Planning for Cryptocurrency. Taxation of Exempts 33, 35-40.

Author