Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Theme Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Conference Blog
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Social work organizations increasingly need to demonstrate how and whether or not they are performing in an effective and impactful manner. To provide this evidence, performance measurement tools are being introduced into social work practices. This means a shift from a "trust me" to a "prove me" culture, putting pressure on social work organizations not only to perform well but also to document and communicate about it in a clear way. This has led to a growing interest in performance measurement among social work organizations, leading them to develop their own performance measurement instruments. However, research shows that social work organizations face difficulties in developing such instruments. Especially when they want to take into account the co-determination of social workers and their clients. Through participatory observations, this research offers unique insights into the challenges related to the development process of a performance measurement instrument in which a social work organization attempts to implement co-determination work into the instrument by actively involving social workers in the development process. The research reveals challenges at three levels: (1) conceptualizing performance, (2) operationalizing performance into a measurement instrument, and (3) implementing the performance measurement instrument in the social work practice.
Arvidson, M., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social Impact Measurement and Non-profit Organisations:
Compliance, Resistance, and Promotion [journal article]. VOLUNTAS: International
Journal of Voluntary Non-profit Organisations, 25(4), 869-886.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9373-6
Benjamin, L. M., & Campbell, D. C. (2015). Nonprofit performance: Accounting for the agency
of clients. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(5), 988-1006.
Benjamin, L. M., Voida, A., & Bopp, C. (2018). Policy fields, data systems, and the performance
of nonprofit human service organizations. Human Service Organizations: Management,
Leadership & Governance, 42(2), 185-204.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2017.1422072
Carnochan, S., Samples, M., Myers, M., & Austin, M. J. (2014). Performance measurement
challenges in nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector
Quarterly, 43(6), 1014-1032.
Fink, A., & Roholt, R. V. (2022). Emerging Tensions in Data Work: Staff and Youth Perspectives
in Youth-Serving Organizations. Social Service Review, 96(4), 617-654. https://doi.org/10.1086/722277
Greiling, D., & Stötzer, S. (2016). Accountability Reporting in Austrian Non-Profit OrganizationsMore Than a Compliance Instrument? Public Administration Quarterly, 256-287.
Jolles, M. P., Collins-Camargo, C., McBeath, B., Bunger, A. C., & Chuang, E. (2017). Managerial
strategies to influence frontline worker understanding of performance measures in
nonprofit child welfare agencies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(6), 1166-
1188.
LeRoux, K., & Wright, N. S. (2021). Assessing performance and public value in the hollow state.
In Performance and Public Value in the ‘Hollow State’ (pp. 1-24). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Mosley, J. E., & Smith, S. R. (2018). Human service agencies and the question of impact: Lessons
for theory, policy, and practice. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership
& Governance, 42(2), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2018.1425953
Poole, D. L., Nelson, J., Carnahan, S., Chepenik, N. G., & Tubiak, C. (2000). Evaluating
performance measurement systems in nonprofit agencies: The program
accountability quality scale (PAQS). American Journal of Evaluation, 21(1), 15-26.