Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Theme Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Conference Blog
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Submission Type: Panel
This panel includes chapters from the Handbook of Critical Perspectives on Nonprofit Organizing and Voluntary Action — soon to be published by Edward Elgar — the first major survey of critical scholarship within the field of nonprofit organizing and voluntary action. This is one of two panels being proposed for ISTR and includes chapters from Part I of the volume providing an overview of the field and a review of critical civil society research. While scholars in the field have been doing critical work for some time as Coule, Dodge and Eikenberry (2022) show in their review of this work, such a volume is long overdue and will provide essential and much needed counterarguments and alternative perspectives to traditional, often managerialist and neoliberal approaches that have dominated the literature in recent decades. The publication of this volume is essential during the contemporary moment of democratic backsliding, authoritarian rule, and accelerated restriction of rights of those who are marginalized, which is threatening in so many ways to nonprofit and voluntary action the world over. The chapters in this volume could be seen, in effect, as a call to action for nonprofit and voluntary action scholars to interrogate these issues, particularly as they impact those at the margins, critically exploring the role of nonprofit organizations and voluntary action in these spaces. We have brought together in this volume both leading and emerging critical scholars in the nonprofit and voluntary action field who explore the major issues facing the field from a variety of critical lenses and present them as ways to propel the field toward more equitable and just ends.
A new or renewed interest in critical perspectives in the field of nonprofit organizing and voluntary action has taken place in recent years; what Dean and Wiley (2022) describe as a “critical turn,” which “has come from a view of the subject area as failing to examine political, systemic and structural issues that may be shaping organisations and behaviours…” (p. 11). Coule, Dodge and Eikenberry (2022) show that in a way this may be a critical “return” as critical research appeared to be more prevalent in the 1970s and dipped as the field has increasingly strived to be seen as more ‘scientific’ or ‘legitimate’ as a social science; however, now there appears to be a resurgence, as evidenced by the growth of critical work in recent years and an increase in scholarly works published in leading third sector journals, especially Voluntas.
Included in the volume are the discernable yet often overlapping themes of critical work that have developed within our field and explored in the volume:
• Postcolonial Theory and Epistemologies of the South
• Critical Race Theories
• Critical Feminist Theories
• Queer Theory
• Critical Disability Theory
• Post-Structural Theories
• Critical Management Studies
The volume concludes with a call for imagining better futures for humans and nonhumans alike, including the voices of all.
Abrecht, M. (2019), ‘Introduction, postcolonialism cross-examined’, in M. Abrecht (ed), Postcolonialism Cross-Examined: Multidirectional Perspectives on Imperial and Colonial Pasts and the Neocolonial Present, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1-47.
Abu-Assab, N., N. Nasser-Eddin and R. Seghaier (2020), ‘Activism and the economy of victimhood: A close look into NGO-ization in Arabic-speaking countries’, Interventions, 22 (4), 481-497.
Adler, P. S., L. C. Forbes and H. Willmott (2008), ‘Critical management studies’, The Academy of Management Annals, 1 (1), 119-179.
Agger, B. (1991), ‘Critical theory, poststructuralism, postmodernism: Their sociological relevance’, Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 105-131.
Agger, B. (1998), Critical Social Theories: An Introduction, Boulder: Westview Press.
Agger, B. (2013), Critical Social Theories: An Introduction (3rd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Akella, D. (2020), ‘Bullying employees in a nonprofit organization’, in D. Akella (ed), Understanding Workplace Bullying: An Ethical and Legal Perspective, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 71–99.
Abrecht, M. (2019), ‘Introduction, postcolonialism cross-examined’, in M. Abrecht (ed), Postcolonialism Cross-Examined: Multidirectional Perspectives on Imperial and Colonial Pasts and the Neocolonial Present, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1-47.
Alvesson, M. and H. Willmott (1992), Critical Management Studies, London: Sage.
Alvesson, M. and H. Willmott (2003), Studying Management Critically, London: Sage.
Andrucki, M. J. and G. S. Elder (2007), ‘Locating the state in queer space: GLBT non-profit organizations in Vermont’, Social & Cultural Geography, 8 (1), 89-104.
Asante, G., and J. N. Hanchey (2021), ‘Decolonizing queer modernities: The case for queer (post) colonial studies in critical/cultural communication’, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 18 (2), 212-220.
Albrecht, S. L. (1972), ‘Environmental social movements and counter-movements: An overview and an illustration’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1 (4), 2–11.
Atia, M., and C. E. Herrold (2018), ‘Governing through patronage: The rise of NGOs and the fall of civil society in Palestine and Morocco’, Voluntas, 29 (5), 1044–1054.
Balanoff, E. K. (2014), ‘A special, set-apart place no longer?’, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35 (1), 11–27.
Bandyopadhyay, R., Banerjee, P., & Samaddar, R. (eds.). (2021). India's Migrant Workers and the Pandemic. London: Routledge.
Bradley, M. T. (2005), ‘Civil society and democratic progression in postcolonial Nigeria: The role of non-governmental organizations’, Journal of Civil Society, 1 (1), 61-74.
Barry-Murphy, E., and M. Stephenson (2018), ‘Democratizing the refugee regime complex’, Voluntas, 29 (4), 790–800.
Beaton, E. E., M. Lepere-Schloop and R. Smith (2021), ‘‘Whatever it takes’: Sexual harassment in the context of resource dependence’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31 (4), 617–633.
Benjamin, S., E. Bottone and M. Lee (2021), ‘Beyond accessibility: Exploring the representation of people with disabilities in tourism promotional materials,’ Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29 (2-3), 295-313.
Biss, D. C., T. A. Dykstra-DeVette and P. Geist-Martin (2022), ‘Bridging trauma-informed care and organizational accommodations: an ethnographic analysis of tensional knots in an anti-violence nonprofit’, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 50 (2), 129-148.
Black, S. and A. Verbos (2022), ‘Native nations’ social enterprise: A tribal critical race theory model’, Indigenous Business & Public Administration, 1 (1), 1–13.
Boda, P. A., E. A. Nusbaum and S. S. Kulkarni (2022), ‘From ‘what is’ toward ‘what if’ through intersectionality: Problematizing ableist erasures and coloniality in racially just research’, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 45 (4), 356-369.
Brayboy, B. M. J. (2005), ‘Toward a tribal critical race theory in education’, The Urban Review, 37 (5), 425-446.
Brown, K., E. Peña, E. Broido, L. Stapleton and N. Evans (2019), ‘Understanding disability frameworks in higher education research’, in J. Huisman and M. Tight (ed), Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, 5, Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing, 19-36.
Buchanan, I. (2018), A Dictionary of Critical Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Calas, M. B. and L. Smircich (2006), ‘From the woman's point of view ten years later: Towards a feminist organization studies’, in S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence and W. R. Nord (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies (2nd ed), London: Sage, 284-346.
Chang, R. S. (1993), ‘Toward an Asian American legal scholarship: Critical race theory, post-structuralism, and narrative space’, California Law Review, 81 (5), 1241-1324.
Chaudhry V. V. (2019), ‘Centering the “evil twin”: Rethinking transgender in queer theory’, A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 25 (1), 45–50.
Chen, K. H. (2010), ‘Decolonization’, in K-H Chen (ed), Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 65-114.
Chevrette, R. (2013), ‘Outing heteronormativity in interpersonal and family communication: Feminist applications of queer theory “beyond the sexy streets”’, Communication Theory, 23 (2), 170–190.
Christiansen-Ruffman, L. (1985), ‘Participation theory and the methodological construction of invisible women: Feminism’s call for appropriate methodology’, Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 14 (2–3), 94–111.
Clegg, S. R., D. Courpasson and N. Phillips (2006), Power and Organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Cornwall, A. (2020), ‘Decolonizing Development Studies: Pedagogic reflections’, The Radical Teacher, 116, 37-46.
Coule, T. M. (2013), ‘Theories of knowledge and focus groups in organization and management research’, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 8 (2), 148–162.
Coule, T. M. and C. Bain (2021), Organizing Logics, Nonprofit Management and Change: Rethinking Power, Persuasion and Authority. Routledge: New York.
Coule, T. M., J. Dodge and A. M. Eikenberry. (2020), ‘Toward a typology of critical nonprofit studies: A literature review’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51 (3), 478–506.
Crawford, R. M. (2021), ‘Is being respectable enough? A critical investigation of codeswitching and the lived experiences of black leaders who work at nonprofits in Bridgertown’, doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University.
Creech, B. and P. Parks. (2021), ‘Promises granted: Venture philanthropy and tech ideology in metajournalistic discourse,’ Journalism Studies, 23 (1), 70–88.
Cunliffe, A.L. (2010), ‘Crafting qualitative research: Morgan and Smircich 30 years on’, Organizational Research Methods, 14 (4), 647-673.
Dale, E. J. and B. Breeze. (2022), ‘Making the tea or making it to the top? How gender stereotypes impact women fundraisers’ careers’, Voluntary Sector Review, 13 (1), 19–36.
Danley, S. and B. Blessett (2022), ‘Nonprofit segregation: The exclusion and impact of white nonprofit networks’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51 (3), 507–526.
Dean, J. (2014), ‘Manufacturing citizens: The dichotomy between policy and practice in youth volunteering in the UK’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, 35 (1): 46–62.
Dean, J. (2017), Doing Reflexivity: An Introduction, Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Dean, J. (2021), ‘Informal volunteering, inequality, and illegitimacy’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51 (3), 527–544.
Dean, J. and K. Wiley (2022), ‘Critical theory, qualitative methods and the non-profit and voluntary sector: An introduction to the special issue,’ Voluntary Sector Review, 13 (1), 11-17.
Dean-Coffey, J. (2018), ‘What’s race got to do with it? Equity and philanthropic evaluation practice’, American Journal of Evaluation, 39 (4), 527–542.
Delgado, R. and J. Stefancic (2012), Critical Race Theory: An Introduction, New York and London: New York University Press.
DeVolder, E. (2017), Overcoming the Overcoming Story: Critical Disability Informed Genealogies of Compulsory Heroism, doctoral dissertation, The University of British Columbia.
Dey, P. and S. Teasdale (2013), ‘Social enterprise and dis/identification: The politics of identity work in the English third sector’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, 35 (2), 248–270.
Dhanani, A. (2019). ‘Identity constructions in the annual reports of international development NGOs: Preserving institutional interests?’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 59 (1), 1-31.
Dodge, J., A. M. Eikenberry and T. M. Coule (2022), ‘Illustrating the value of critical methodologies through third-sector gender studies: A case for pluralism’, Voluntas, 33 (6), 1140–1147.
Ebrahim, A. (2001), ‘NGO behavior and development discourse: Cases from western India’, Voluntas, 12 (2), 79–101.
Elkchirid, A., A. P. Ngo and M. K. Kumsa (2020), ‘Narrating colonial silences: Racialized social work educators unsettling our settlerhood’, Studies in Social Justice, 14 (2), 287-305.
Ericsson, D. and M. Kostera (2020), ‘Alterethnography: Reading and writing otherness in organizations’, Gender, Work & Organization, 27 (6), 1402-1417.
Escobar, A. (2018), Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Evans, L. and W. L. Moore (2015), ‘Impossible burdens: White institutions, emotional labor, and micro-resistance’, Social Problems, 62 (3), 439–454.
Eynaud, P., J. Maïté and D. Mourey (2018), ‘Participatory art as a social practice of commoning to reinvent the right to the city’, Voluntas, 29 (4), 621–636.
Feagin, J. R. (2006), Systemic Racism: A Theory of Oppression, New York: Routledge.
Feit, M. E., J. B. Philips and T. Coats (2022), ‘Tightrope of advocacy: Critical race methods as a lens on nonprofit mediation between fear and trust in the U.S. Census’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, 44 (1), 23–45.
Foucault, M. (1969), L’Archéologie du Savoir [The Archaeology of Knowledge], Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
Frewer, T. (2013), ‘Doing NGO work: The politics of being “civil society” and promoting “good governance” in Cambodia’, Australian Geographer, 44 (1), 97-114.
Gillespie, E. M., R. M. Mirabella and A. M. Eikenberry (2019), ‘#Metoo/#Aidtoo and creating an intersectional feminist NPO/NGO sector’, Nonprofit Policy Forum, 10 (4), 1-9.
Gilmore, S., N. Harding, J. Helin and A. Pullen (2019), ‘Writing differently’, Management Learning, 50 (10), 3–10.
Gladden, S. N. and J. L. Daniel (2022), ‘The plantation’s fall and the nonprofit sector’s rise: Addressing the influence of the antebellum plantation on today’s nonprofit sector’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, 44 (2), 123–132.
Goddard, A. (2021), ‘Accountability and accounting in the NGO field comprising the UK and Africa: A Bordieusian analysis’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 78 (1), 1-20.
Goodley, D., R. Lawthom, K. Liddiard and K. Runswick-Cole (2019), ‘Provocations for critical disability studies’, Disability & Society, 34 (6), 972-997.
Goodley, D. and R. Lawthom (2013), ‘Hardt and Negri and the geo-political imagination: Empire, multitude and critical disability studies’, Critical Sociology, 39 (3), 369-384.
Goodley, D. and K. Runswick-Cole (2015), ‘Big Society? Disabled people with the label of learning disabilities and the queer(y)ing of civil society’, Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 17 (1), 1-13.
Haqpana, S. and M. Tsouroufli (2023, May), ‘”Powerless, poor and needy?”: Reproducing colonial discourses of gender and Muslim women through educational interventions by INGOs in Afghanistan’, Women's Studies International Forum, 98 (May-June), 1-12.
Harding, N. and H. Lee (2009), ‘Queer(y)ing voluntary sector services: An example from health promotion’, in G. Currie, J. Ford, N. Harding and M. Learmonth (eds), Making Public Services Management Critical. New York: Routledge, pp. 217-228.
Hardner, K. L. and M. R. Wolf (2021), ‘Using feminist theory as a research method in the examination of trauma-informed care in a non-profit organisation’, Voluntary Sector Review, 13 (1), 37–52.
Harmer, C. E. (2018), ‘Algorithmic governance and civil society: The impact of big data on order and reflexivity’, doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Australia.
Heckler, N. (2019), ‘Whiteness and masculinity in nonprofit organizations: Law, money, and institutional race and gender’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, 41 (3), 266–285.
Henry, J. (2019), ‘The unspeakable whiteness of volunteer tourism’, Annals of Tourism Research, 76 (C), 326–327.
Hofmann, M. D. Kasnitz, J. Mankoff and C. L. Bennett (2020), ‘Living disability theory: Reflections on access, research, and design’, Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 1-13.
Holgersson, C. and J. Hvenmark (2023), ‘Gender in nonprofit organizations: A critical review and research agenda’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, online first.
Höpfl, H. (2000), ‘The suffering mother and the miserable son, organizing women and organizing women’s writing’, Gender, Work and Organization, 7 (2), 98–105.
Hvenmark, J. (2013), ‘Business as usual? On managerialization and the adoption of the balanced scorecard in a democratically governed civil society organization’, Administrative Theory and Praxis, 35 (2), 223-247.
Hvenmark, J. (2016), ‘Ideology, practice, and process? A review of the concept of managerialism in civil society studies, Voluntas, 27 (6), 2833–2859.
Jagose, A. (1996), Queer Theory: An Introduction, New York: New York University Press.
Jensen, C. (2013), ‘Foundations and the discourse of philanthropy’, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35 (1), 106–127.
Jessen, M. H. (2019), ‘Rescuing welfare society: Political strategies for mobilizing civil society in Denmark, 2010–2018’, Voluntas, 30 (2), 369–380.
Jezierska, K. and D. V. Polanska (2018), ‘Social movements seen as radical political actors: The case of the Polish tenants’ movement’, Voluntas, 29 (4), 683–696.
Jimenez-Luque, A. (2021), ‘Decolonial leadership for cultural resistance and social change: Challenging the social order through the struggle of identity’, Leadership, 17 (2), 154-172.
Johnson, P., A. Buehring, C. Cassell and G. Symon (2006), ‘Evaluating qualitative management research: Towards a contingent criteriology’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 8 (3), 131–156.
Jung, S., A. Eikenberry, K. Webb Farley and L. Brainard. (2022), ‘How do foundations support (anti-)racism? A critical race theory perspective on philanthropy and racial equity’, Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, e1744.
Kelly, C. (2018), ‘A future for disability: Perceptions of disabled youth and nonprofit organizations’, Social Theory & Health, 16 (1), 44-59.
Kenney, S. J. (2005), ‘Domestic violence intervention program: Unconditional shelter?’, Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 16 (2), 221–243.
Keucheyan, R. (2013), The Left Hemisphere: Mapping Critical Theory Today. London: Verso.
King, A. (2021), ‘Queer futures? Forget it! Dementia, queer theory and the limits of normativity’, Journal of Aging Studies, 63 (December), 1-8
King, D. (2017), ‘Becoming business-like: Governing the nonprofit professional’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46 (2), 241–260.
King, D. and M. Griffin (2019), ‘Nonprofits as schools for democracy: The justifications for organizational democracy within nonprofit organizations,’ Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48 (5), 910-930.
Kloster, M. O. (2020), ‘From complexity to simplicity: How chasing success stories affects gendered NGO practices’, Development in Practice, 30 (4), 437–447.
Koch, M. (2022), ‘State-civil society relations in Gramsci, Poulantzas and Bourdieu: Strategic implications for the degrowth movement’, Ecological Economics, 193 (March), 1-9.
Kourula, A. and G. Delalieux (2016), ‘The micro-level foundations and dynamics of political corporate social responsibility: Hegemony and passive revolution through civil society’, Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 769–785.
Kutay, A. (2021), ‘Governing through civil society’, in A. Kutay (ed.), NGOs, Civil Society and Structural Changes, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 107–130.
Lachapelle, M. D. (2021), ‘Emancipatory social innovation: Within and beyond the innovative society’, Voluntas, 32 (5): 1113–1125.
Land, C. and D. King (2014), ‘Organizing otherwise: translating anarchism in a voluntary sector organization’, Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organisation, 14 (4), 923-950.
Lang'at, K. (2008), ‘Deconstructing neo-colonialism and liberalism: Kenya and the NGOs--A discourse analysis’, International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 9 (2), 57-68.
Larsson, O. L. (2021), ‘Why more civil society will not lead to less domination: Dealing with present day state phobia through Michel Foucault and neo-republicanism’, Journal of Political Power, 14 (1), 258–275.
Lau, E. (2022), ‘Girls who learn to serve: An ethnography exploring the gendered experience of school-based volunteering’, Voluntary Sector Review, 13 (1), 97–115.
Lee, H. (1990), Critical Social Research, London: Unwin Hyman.
Li, V. (2017), ‘‘Shopping for change’: World Vision Canada and consumption-oriented philanthropy in the age of philanthrocapitalism’, Voluntas, 28 (2): 455–471.
Lincoln, Y. S. and E. G. Guba (1986), ‘But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation’, New Directions for Evaluation, 1986 (30), 73–84.
Lincoln, Y.S., S. A. Lynham and E. G. Guba (2018), “Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging influences, revisited” in N. K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 108-150.
Mann, G. (2015), From Empires to NGOs in the West African Sahel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mallipeddi, N. V. and R. A. VanDaalen (2022), ‘Intersectionality within critical autism studies: A narrative review’, Autism in Adulthood, 4 (4), 281-289.
McCormack, M. (2020), ‘Gay, inc.: The nonprofitization of queer politics’, Contemporary Sociology, 49 (2), 137–139.
McDuie-Ra, D. (2007), ‘The constraints on civil society beyond the state: Gender-based insecurity in Meghalaya, India’, Voluntas, 18 (4), 359–384.
McGee, D. (2019), ‘Youth, reinventive institutions and the moral politics of future-making in postcolonial Africa’, Sociology, 53 (1), 156-173.
McGovern, P. (2014), ‘Small voluntary organisations in Britain’s ‘Big Society’: A Bourdieusian approach’, Voluntas, 25 (3), 636–656.
Mediavilla, J. and J. Garcia-Arias. (2019), ‘Philanthrocapitalism as a neoliberal (development agenda) artefact: philanthropic discourse and hegemony in (financing for) international development philanthrocapitalism as a neoliberal (development agenda) artefact: Philanthropic discourse and hegemony’, Globalizations, 16 (6), 857–875.
Metzendorf, D. and R. A. Cnaan (1992), ‘Volunteers in feminist organizations, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2 (3), 255–269.
Meyer, S. and J. L. Millesen (2022), ‘Queer up your work: Adding sexual orientation and gender identity to public and nonprofit research’, Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 8 (1), 145-156.
Meyer, S. J., E. J. Dale and K. K. M. Willis (2022), ‘“Where my gays at?” The status of LGBTQ people and queer theory in nonprofit research’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51 (3), 566–586.
Meyers, S. (2020), ‘Rethinking citizenship, self-help, and disability in local context: Solidaridad as disability citizenship in Nicaragua’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 40 (3), https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/6977/5710.
Minton, H. L. (1997), ‘Queer theory: Historical roots and implications for psychology’, Theory & Psychology, 7 (3), 337-353.
Mirabella, R. M. (2013), ‘Toward a more perfect nonprofit: The performance mindset and the ‘gift’’, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35 (1), 81–105.
Mitchell, G. E., H. P. Schmitz and T. Bruno-van Vijfeijken (2020), Between Power and Irrelevance: The Future of Transnational NGOs, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mitra, A. and J. D. Knottnerus (2008), ‘Sacrificing women: A study of ritualized practices among women volunteers in India’, Voluntas 19 (3), 242–267.
Mladenov, T. (2016), Critical Theory and Disability: A Phenomenological Approach, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Moller, C. (2019), ‘“More than food”: A critical discourse and dispositive analysis of food charity in the UK’, doctoral dissertation, University of Huddersfield.
Mower, R. L. (2022), ‘A Baltimore benevolence thing? American philanthropy, neoliberal fitness, and the persistence of ‘colorblind’ racial silencing’, Sociology of Sport Journal, 1–9.
Naples, N. A., L. Mauldin and H. Dillaway (2019), ‘From the guest editors: Gender, disability, and intersectionality’, Gender & Society, 33 (1), 5-18.
Narayanaswamy, L. (2014), ‘NGOs and feminisms in development: Interrogating the ‘Southern women's NGO’, Geography Compass, 8 (8), 576-589.
Nickel, P. M. (2018), ‘Philanthropy and the politics of well-being’, PS: Political Science & Politics, 51 (1), 61–66.
Nickel, P. M. and A. M. Eikenberry (2013), ‘Gastrophilanthropy: Utopian aspiration and aspirational consumption as political retreat’, Reconstruction, 12 (4), https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/pubadfacpub/33/.
Nickels, A. E. and K. A. Leach (2021), ‘Toward a more just nonprofit sector: Leveraging a critical approach to disrupt and dismantle white masculine space’, Public Integrity, 23 (5), 515–530.
Nguyen, X. T. and D. Stienstra (2020), ‘Engaging girls and women with disabilities in the global South: Beyond cultural and geopolitical generalizations’, Disability and the Global South, 8 (2), 2035-2052.
Okun, T. (2021), ‘White supremacy culture – Still here.’ http://www.whitesupremacyculture.info/.
Papazoglakis, S. (2021), “‘Feminist, gun-toting abolitionist with a bankroll’: The black radical philanthropy of Mary Ellen Pleasant’, New Global Studies, 12 (2), 235–256.
Parker, M. (2002), Against aMnagement: Organisation in the Age of Managerialism, Oxford: Polity.
Parker, M. (2018), Shut Down the Business School: What’s Wrong with Management Education. London: Pluto Press.
Philips, J. (2020), ‘Application of the critical race and latino critical theories to explore social innovation in nonprofit services addressing HIV/AIDS issues in Texas’, doctoral dissertation, University of Texas Arlington.
Pick, D., K. Holmes and M. Brueckner (2011), ‘Governmentalities of volunteering: A study of regional Western Australia’, Voluntas, 22 (3), 390–408.
Pluciński, P. (2018), ‘Forces of altermodernization: Urban social movements and the new urban question in contemporary Poland’, Voluntas, 29 (4), 653–669.
Rao, S. and M. Kalyanpur (2020), ‘Universal notions of development and disability: Towards whose imagined vision’, Disability and the Global South, 7 (1), 1830-1851.
Ray, V. (2019), ‘A theory of racialized organizations’, American Sociological Review, 84 (1), 26-53.
Safouane, H. (2016), ‘Manufacturing striated space for migrants: An ethnography of initial reception centers for asylum seekers in Germany’, Voluntas, 28 (5), 1922-1939.
Saifer, A. (2020), ‘Racial neoliberal philanthropy and the arts for social change main document’, Organization, 30 (2), 219–239.
Sakue-Collins, Y. (2021), ‘(Un) doing development: A postcolonial enquiry of the agenda and agency of NGOs in Africa’, Third World Quarterly, 42 (5), 976-995.
Sandberg, B. (2013), ‘The road to market’, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35 (1), 28–45.
Sandberg, B. and E. Elliott (2019), ‘Toward a care-centered approach for nonprofit management in a neoliberal era’, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 41 (3), 286–306.
Sandberg, B., R. W. Robichau and A. Russo (2021), ‘Exploring the gendered dimensions of meaningful non-profit work under marketised conditions’, Voluntary Sector Review, 13 (1), 77–96.
Sanders, A. (2022), ‘Elite or grassroots? A feminist institutionalist examination of the role equalities organisations play in delivering representation and participation in a third sector‐government partnership’, Voluntary Sector Review, 13 (1), 53–76.
Seikkula, M. (2020), ‘Different antiracisms: Critical race and whiteness studies perspectives on activist and NGO discussions in Finland’, doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki.
Shachar, I. Y. (2014), ‘The white management of ‘volunteering’: Ethnographic evidence from an Israeli NGO’, Voluntas, 25 (6), 1417–1440.
Shaw, S. and J. B. Allen (2009), ‘“To be a business and to keep our humanity”: A critical management studies analysis of the relationship between a funder and nonprofit community organizations’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20 (1), 83-96.
Shildrick, M. (2019), ‘Critical disability studies: Rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity (2nd edition)’, in N. Watson, A. Roulstone and C. Thomas (eds), Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, London: Routledge, pp. 32-44.
Shortall, S. and R. Mcareavey (2017), ‘Gender, migration and development: Can advocacy groups be more of a hindrance than a help?,’ Social Sciences, 62 (2), 1-17.
Skoss, R. (2018), ‘Navigating “the system” to find supports and services for people with developmental disability’, in K.Ellis, R. Garland-Thomson, M. Kent and R. Robertson (eds), Manifestos for the Future of Critical Disability Studies, London: Routledge, pp. 52-64.
Sousa Santos, B. de (2016), ‘Epistemologies of the South and the future’, From the European South, 1, 17-29.
Sousa Santos, B. de (2020), ‘A new vision of Europe: Learning from the global South’, in B.S. Santos and J. Mendes (eds), Demodiversity: Toward Post-Abyssal Democracies, New York: Routledge, pp. 31-53.
Srinivas, N. (2009), ‘Against NGOs? A critical perspective on nongovernmental action’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38 (4), 614–626.
Stefancic, J. (1997), ‘Latino and Latina critical theory: An annotated bibliography’, California Law Review, 85 (5), 1509-1584.
Tefera, A. A. and G. E. Fischman (2020), ‘How and why context matters in the study of racial disproportionality in special education: Toward a critical disability education policy approach’, Equity & Excellence in Education, 53 (4), 433-448.
Tlostanova, M. (2019), ‘The postcolonial condition, the decolonial option, and the post-socialist intervention’, in M. Albrecht (ed), Postcolonialism Cross-Examined, London: Routledge, pp. 165-178.
Tong, R, (1989), Feminist Thought: A Comprehensive Introduction, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Velasco, K. and P. Paxton (2022), ‘Deconstructed and constructive logics: Explaining inclusive language change in queer nonprofits, 1998–2016’, American Journal of Sociology, 127 (4), 1267-1310.
Viera Magalhães, J. and N. Couldry (2021), ‘Giving by taking away: Big tech, data colonialism and the reconfiguration of social good’, International Journal of Communication, 15, 343-362.
Wehbi, S., L. Elin and Y. El-Lahib (2010), ‘Neo-colonial discourse and disability: The case of Canadian international development NGOs’, Community Development Journal, 45 (4), 404-422.
Welch, N. M. (2019), ‘Completing the circle: Native American athletes giving back to their community’, doctoral dissertation, The University of Tennesee-Knoxville.
White, J. D. and G. B. Adams (1994), ‘Making sense with diversity: The context of research, theory, and knowledge development in public administration’, in J. D. White and G. B. Adams (eds), Research in Public Administration: Reflections on Theory and Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1-22.
Will, M. G. and I. Pies (2017), ‘Discourse failures and the NGO sector: How campaigning can undermine advocacy’, Voluntas, 28 (3), 1078–1109.
Willis, J. W. (2007), Foundations of Qualitative Research: Interpretive and Critical Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wirgau, J. S., K. Webb Farley and C. Jensen (2010), ‘Is business discourse colonizing philanthropy? A critical discourse analysis of (PRODUCT) RED’, Voluntas, 21 (4), 611–630.
Zhulina, A. (2018), ‘Performing philanthropy from Andrew Carnegie to Bill Gates’, Performance Research, 23 (6), 50–57.
The Nature of Critical Global Civil Society Scholarship: Reviewing the State of the Art 1972-2021 - Angela M. Eikenberry, University of Connecticut; Jennifer Dodge, University of Albany; Tracey Coule, Sheffield Hallam University
Oppression, Exploitation and Possibilities for Emancipation under Neoliberalism: Nonprofit Organizing and Voluntary Action from the View of Critical Theory and Postmodernism - Billie Sandberg, Portland State University; Andrew Russo
The Roots of Critical Nonprofit Scholarship – A Reflective Framework - Ellen Bennett, Sheffield Hallam University; Beth Patmore, Nottingham Trent University