Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Track
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Community policing has become a key aspect of citizen security reform across Latin America, offering a new logic of security that promotes prevention over reaction and citizen participation over citizen repression. By envisioning citizens as collaborators rather than enemy combatants, the model of community policing is often championed as a corrective to the repressive logic of mano dura policing. Based on two years of ethnographic work on police reform in Caracas, Venezuela, I argue that, rather than replacing mano dura approaches to security, community policing has been adapted as a complement to those approaches. The combination of extremely high rates of violence and the unique socialist rhetoric of the Chavista governments justifies the use of excessive—even extralegal—force with those who refuse to give up the “malandro” life. In this context, the implementation of a “humanist” approach to security, highly supportive of community policing, has promoted a bifurcated logic that envisions preventative policing bodies as complemented by security forces capable of “exterminating” violent threats to society. Community policing has been adopted and is supported by officers and citizens, but only as a complement to repressive policing. Thus, the way in which community policing has been translated in this context operates to bolster support for militarized and extra-legal responses to crime.