Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Content Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
LRA Home Page
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
New Literacy Studies has long emphasized complexity, openness, and instability. Yet, in a moment of profound social and political precarity, is demonstrating “complexity” a sufficient project for the field? Drawing on theorist Caroline Levine, we critique complexity as an end in itself, arguing for the necessity of structured continuity and shared frameworks. By reconsidering how stability fosters learning and collective action, we reorient literacy research toward material and political urgencies rather than perpetual theoretical expansion.