Advancing Critical Discourse Analysis of Motivated Criticism in Indigenous Consultations: Argument Continuity v. Epistemic Vigilance

• In Event: Contested Dialogues. Who Counts?

Brief Overview

The paper conducts the critical discourse analysis of Indigenous consultation reports by connecting officials' arguments, counterarguments, and reasoning practices to the resources/incentives given by the rules of consultative exchanges.

Author

• Oxana Pimenova, University of Windsor