Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper re-theorizes Stephen Toulmins concept of the argument field in an effort to elucidate the concept of public argumentation. From this theoretical perspective, public argument is conceived as a process whose dynamics are essentially aesthetic, rather than rational and deliberative. A fresh understanding of argument fields provides a conceptual tool for identifying, interpreting, and explaining the fluid processes of recognition and meaning-making under modern conditions of public life.