Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Session Type: Coordinated Paper Session
This coordinated paper session brings together four papers, each of which introduces a new framework for validating assessments in a culturally, linguistically, and socially diverse society. The papers in this session each offer a different approach, but all recognize the central roles that language and culture play in learning, and therefore in the assessment of learning. Additionally, each paper grapples with the sociopolitical power of assessment to perpetuate or disrupt patterns of systemic marginalization.
This session is intended to create conversation among leading measurement professionals who are redefining what it means to validate an assessment in a pluralistic context, where diversity is explicitly valued. After a brief overview of the frameworks from each of the presenting authors, our discussant, Dr. Solano-Flores, will share insights into where our frameworks overlap and where they present opposing viewpoints. We will close with a facilitated panel conversation among the presenting authors that aims to build consensus and identify the most promising paths forward for advancing the theoretical and conceptual foundations of validity within a multicultural, pluralistic setting.
Assessment validation frameworks for culturally responsive assessment - David Slomp, UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE; Mya Poe, Northeastern University; Maria Elena Oliveri, Purdue University
Validity considerations for culturally responsive assessments - Scott Marion, National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment; Suzanne Lane, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
A framework for enacting equity aims in assessment use: A justice-oriented approach - Susan Lyons, Lyons Assessment Consulting; Maria Elena Oliveri, Purdue University; Mya Poe, NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
Prioritizing just social outcomes for diverse readers and writers: A conceptual framework - Elena Forzani, Boston University; Julie Corrigan, Concordia University; David Slomp, UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE