What are important quality criteria for assessments in a competency-based educational program?

Session Type: Organized Discussion

Abstract

There continues to be an increase and interest in competency-based education programs in both K-12 and higher education. The definitions and descriptions of competency-based education programs have assessments as the foundation. But there are various types of assessments that are used. As we know, we must gather evidence to support the quality of these assessments. Unfortunately, many programs start quickly, have limited staff and funding, and are forced to stage the various aspects of evidence over time. Because there are various types of assessments and various types of evidence needed, decisions need to be made as to what evidence should be prioritized first, second, third, etc. In this session, three presenters with experience and expertise in assessment and competency-based education will offer their suggestions for what is the most important criterion for assessments. After each of the presenters have made their suggestions, the chair of this session will ask the presenters whether they would change their recommendation based on what the other presenters indicated. Additionally, the chair will turn to the audience for comments and questions. This session should offer those involved in implementing competency-based education programs and/or responsible for the assessments some actionable ideas.

Sub Unit

• Individual Papers, Innovation Demonstrations, Coordinated Sessions, or Organized Discussions

Session Organizer

• Thanos Patelis, University of Kansas

Moderator

• Thanos Patelis, University of Kansas

Presenters

• Neal Kingston, University of Kansas

• Katie McClarty, MCGRAW HILL EDUCATION

• Scott Marion, National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment