Social Ranking and Transitional Justice Preferences: Examining the Victims of Extremist Insurgency in Nigeria

• In Event: Justice and Representation

Abstract

Transitional justice mechanisms are essential in post-conflict societies, aiming to address past atrocities and foster societal healing. Research indicates that voluntary participation in these policies not only enhances satisfaction among stakeholders but also promotes the successful reintegration of offenders and reduces recidivism. With this in mind, we investigate the justice preferences of individuals in North Nigeria, particularly those most affected by the violence perpetrated by Boko Haram. Utilizing survey data from the Borno region in Nigeria, this paper scrutinizes how transitional justice preferences vary depending on the ethnic group's political influence. We delve into the intricate relationship between these preferences and social hierarchies, drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives. Our analysis underscores how social rankings intersect with people's inclinations towards different transitional justice approaches, such as retributive and restorative justice. Our findings reveal that in communities like Borno, where religion plays a significant role and victims and offenders often share the same religious identity, perceived political power is strongly correlated with the type of transitional justice people prefer. Furthermore, our results indicated that by using a blend of restorative justice policies (amnesty programs) with retributive justice policies (cash payments), policymakers could increase the likelihood of reintegration and healing from harm done by recent conflict.

Author

• Allison D Critcher, Appalachian state University