Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Subject Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Conference
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Location
About NTA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
The Atkinson and Stiglitz (1976) theorem suggests that savings should be neither taxed nor subsidized. However, in practice, taxes or subsidies on savings are widely used by governments worldwide for redistributive purposes. In this paper, we extend a benchmark model to allow for differences in social and individual discount factors, while preserving the assumption that individuals are rational. We show that whether savings should be taxed or subsidized depends critically on these differences. Our analysis suggests that adopting a non-welfarist social welfare function (SWF) would lead to the breakdown of the Atkinson-Stiglitz theorem.