Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Subject Area
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Conference
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Location
About NTA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
These have been hard times for section 501(c)(3) organizations that believe in DEI. President Trump, unhappy with Harvard’s University’s refusal to agree to a long and detailed list of demands has threatened to remove its tax exemption. The American Alliance for Equal Rights filed a complaint with the IRS asserting that the Gates Foundation did not qualify for section 501(c)(3) exempt status because it awarded its scholarships only to students from minority groups.
After explaining the process for revoking exempt status, this piece describes the two most likely bases for the IRS to revoke the exemption of a section 501(c)(3) that advances DEI – loss of exemption for violation of fundamental public policy, and loss of exemption because of substantial illegal purposes. It then considers legislation that would permit the Secretary of the Treasury to suspend the exemption of organizations designated as supporting terrorism. It separately evaluates any IRS move to revoke Harvard’s tax exemption, including statutory prohibitions on executive branch interference, and the consequences of revocation.
The paper advises that tax-exempt organizations have solid bases on which to answer attempted revocation. They have a number of ways to respond to any attempts at revocation. They can make changes, large and small, to current operations. They can go to court. But they, along with their advisers, need to consider now the choices they will make and the actions they will take. The article concludes with Justice Powell’s observation in his Bob Jones concurrence: “the provision of tax exemptions to nonprofit groups is one indispensable means of limiting the influence of governmental orthodoxy on important areas of community life.” This statement stands as an important reminder for both charities and the current administration.