Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Strand
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Keyword
Browse By Type of Research
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Researchers have argued that students and teachers construct unproductive inverse function meanings. We used semi-structured task-based clinical interviews to understand further students’ inverse meanings. We interviewed 25 students using an interview protocol that consisted of decontextualized and contextualized tasks including analytical (e.g., equation) or graphical representations. We illustrate the students held compartmentalized meanings for inverse function dependent on the function and/or representation. An important finding is the extent students focused on carrying out a particular activity (e.g., switching x and y); to most students, carrying out a particular activity dependent on representation and context was their meaning for inverse.
Irma Emma Stevens, University of Georgia
Kevin R. LaForest, University of Georgia
Natalie Hobson, University of Georgia
Teo Paoletti, Montclair State University
Kevin C. Moore, University of Georgia