Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Person
Browse by Day
Browse By Room
Browse By Strand
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Keyword
Browse By Mode of Inquiry
Search Tips
Conference Center Map
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In our previous work on teacher noticing we proposed three types of representations of practice: static, dynamic, and malleable. Malleable representations, like simulations, afford opportunities for PTs to influence the elicitation of student’s thinking through their questioning. As they question, PTs are engaged in iterative cycles of attending and interpreting of student’s thinking, two central components of teacher noticing (van Es & Sherin, 2008). We present research using models of students’ mathematical thinking (Norton, 2018; von Glaserfeld, 1995) to explain the ways in which PTs (n = 7) were able to construct explanatory, predictive, and generalizable models of a hypothetical student’s thinking across a series of four simulation activities. Our results demonstrate improvement in PTs’ model building over time when accounting for simulations whose strategies involve similar mathematical structure and properties.