Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper will investigate examples of how the terms and categories of Reason of State and/or 'Tacitist' political thought were introduced, accepted, or resisted in political counsel or decision-making during the Dutch Revolt (1560s to 1640s). Some political counsellors or secretaries employ the then modern and controversial political thought originating in Reason of State and Tacitism. Examples are Jean Hotman (the Earl of Leicester's secretary in the Low Countries), Justus Lipsius (who repeatedly acted as political advisor to the Archdukes of the Southern Netherlands), Hugo Grotius (who occupied a position very close to the government of the province of Holland), and Vergilio Malvezzi (counsellor at the Spanish Habsburg government). Understanding their struggle to negotiate the acute gap between conventional political ethics and those of Reason of State was acute is essential to our understanding the political thought of that period.