Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

2-151 - New evidence for the distinction between reactive and proactive aggression

Fri, March 20, 1:55 to 3:25pm, Penn CC, Floor: 100 Level, Room 103A

Session Type: Paper Symposium

Integrative Statement

Aggressive behavior can take different functions. It may be impulsive and defensive in response to provocation, i.e. reactive aggression, or it be more planful and goal-oriented to obtain material gain or social dominance, i.e. proactive aggression (Dodge, 1991). Although reactive and proactive aggression are statistically related and tend to co-occur, there appear to be unique correlates for the two functions of aggression (Card & Little, 2006). In the current symposium three studies will provide new evidence for the distinction between reactive and proactive aggression. The first study focuses on the prognostic and clinical value of the distinction between reactive and proactive aggression in a clinical sample of boys with severe disruptive behavior problems. In the second paper unique associations between social status among peers, more specifically peer popularity, and the two functions of aggression in a normative sample of adolescents were tested. The third study, including data of 13 cultural groups in nine countries, tested cross-cultural differences between (perceptions of) functions of aggression and its associations with different types of aggression. Together, the three presentations provide new insight in the validity and utility of the distinction between reactive and proactive aggression in normative and clinical samples across countries. Findings of different cognitive and behavioral antecedents and consequences for the two constructs have implications for diagnosis, prevention, and intervention. This will be further discussed in light of the ongoing debate on the distinction between reactive and proactive aggression (Miller & Lynam, 2006).

Sub Unit

Chair

Discussant

Individual Presentations