Session Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

2-005 - Pedagogy and Ostension from Comparative and Developmental Perspectives

Fri, March 20, 8:00 to 9:30am, Penn CC, Floor: 100 Level, Room 103A

Session Type: Paper Symposium

Integrative Statement

What does sensitivity to ostensive or pedagogical cues mean for children of different ages, or animals of different species? This symposium brings together research on infants, pre-schoolers, non-human primates and dogs, to discuss new data on how ostensive cues influence what members of these different groups attend to, learn or decide to copy. Hernik & Csibra show that young infants have a bias to interpret even very minimal cues as directional when accompanied by infant-directed speech. Butler and Tomasello find that 2- and 3-year-old children clearly distinguish between pedagogical demonstrations and non-pedagogical actions, but that their use of that distinction in guiding their generalizations depends heavily on other contextual factors. Viryani & Range show that the communicative context changes the behaviour of dogs in several different paradigms: such as gaze following and imitation. Buchsbaum et al. show that capuchin monkeys can perhaps differentiate unintentional, intentional and pedagogical demonstrations when deciding what to copy, and may therefore be sensitive to at least some of the ostensive cues associated with human pedagogy. By bringing these disparate research strands together we will be able to discuss the role played by sensitivity to ostensive cues over evolution and development. We hope to stimulate debate around the issue of how these different groups interpret ostensive and pedagogical displays. By what mechanism does ostensive communication influence behaviour?

Sub Unit

Chairs

Individual Presentations